2017
DOI: 10.3390/e19060265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Multi-Event Non-Point Source Pollution in a Data-Scarce Catchment Using ANN and Entropy Analysis

Abstract: Event-based runoff-pollutant relationships have been the key for water quality management, but the scarcity of measured data results in poor model performance, especially for multiple rainfall events. In this study, a new framework was proposed for event-based non-point source (NPS) prediction and evaluation. The artificial neural network (ANN) was used to extend the runoff-pollutant relationship from complete data events to other data-scarce events. The interpolation method was then used to solve the problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inaccuracy of the time series can be accounted for by the type of NN model. The FNN models need more data for training (Chen et al 2017). The time-series analysis, however, had a higher percentage of data points used for model testing, compared to the randomization analysis.…”
Section: Fnn Model Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inaccuracy of the time series can be accounted for by the type of NN model. The FNN models need more data for training (Chen et al 2017). The time-series analysis, however, had a higher percentage of data points used for model testing, compared to the randomization analysis.…”
Section: Fnn Model Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, precipitation amount was used to classify rainfall-runoff events to be different types in previous research. This solution is computationally simple and straightforward but intended to facilitate streamflow forecasting and risk management [38,[41][42][43][44]. The specific criterion is presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Site and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%