AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Multirotor Aerodynamic Interactions Through the Vortex Particle Method

Abstract: Distributed electric propulsion and vertical takeoff and landing has recently opened a new design space for urban air mobility. However, the use of multiple rotors operating in close proximity introduces complicated aerodynamic interactions that are not well understood, are not captured through conventional design tools, and need to be addressed in the conceptual design stage. This study investigates the accuracy of the viscous vortex particle method (VPM) in modeling rotor-on-rotor aerodynamic interactions in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these solvers required a robust experimental validation, especially to evaluate their capabilities of accurately simulating the strong interactional effects that are typical of the flow fields of multi-propeller configurations. With this aim, Alvarez and Ning [14,15] reproduced the side-by-side propeller experiment in hover conditions conducted by Zhou et al [5] using a mid-fidelity aerodynamic VPM code and found a quite promising agreement in terms of flow-field representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, these solvers required a robust experimental validation, especially to evaluate their capabilities of accurately simulating the strong interactional effects that are typical of the flow fields of multi-propeller configurations. With this aim, Alvarez and Ning [14,15] reproduced the side-by-side propeller experiment in hover conditions conducted by Zhou et al [5] using a mid-fidelity aerodynamic VPM code and found a quite promising agreement in terms of flow-field representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where ρ and V ∞ denote the air density and freestream velocity, respectively. The interference drag due to thrusters' interaction is ignored because it affects the propulsive efficiency by less than 3% [31].…”
Section: Step 1: Aerodynamic Analysis Of Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a viscous effect enables the viscous VPM to model the vortex mixing and decaying that is crucial for complex dynamic simulations, such as the travel of vortex rings [29,30] and viscous flows with the presence of the wall and objects [36,37]. Furthermore, it led the way to the aforementioned hybrid schemes where viscous VPM is combined with panels methods [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties with a strictly connected wake of panels motivated the rotorcraft aerodynamic community to consider alternative wake representation, such as the VPM. One advantage of the VPM is that it can be mixed with any lifting surface modeling such as 2D blade elements [39], vortex lattice method [26,51] and the panel method [40,52,53]. VPM has proven to be a useful prediction tool for the wake representation of hovering rotors both in and out of ground effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%