Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2934872.2959069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Native Software Components as Virtual Network Functions

Abstract: Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) are often realized using virtual machines (VMs) because they provide an isolated environment compatible with classical cloud computing technologies. However, VMs are demanding in terms of required resources (CPU and memory) and therefore not suitable for low-cost devices like residential gateways. Such equipment often runs a Linux-based operating system that includes by default a (large) number of common network functions, which can provide some of the services otherwise offere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traffic processing in residential gateways has been proposed also in the context of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) [31,32]. An existing NFV infrastructure can employ residential gateways to deploy lightweight Native Network Functions [33] or eBPF data plane programs [34], in order to provide delaysensitive services to the user, while computation intensive services are hosted in the data center of the service operator. This solution offers flexibility in the type and number of network services that can be provided and represents an interesting target platform for the deployment of U-Filter.…”
Section: Memory Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic processing in residential gateways has been proposed also in the context of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) [31,32]. An existing NFV infrastructure can employ residential gateways to deploy lightweight Native Network Functions [33] or eBPF data plane programs [34], in order to provide delaysensitive services to the user, while computation intensive services are hosted in the data center of the service operator. This solution offers flexibility in the type and number of network services that can be provided and represents an interesting target platform for the deployment of U-Filter.…”
Section: Memory Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the proposed modeling approach has been defined with NFV in mind, it can be applied to nonvirtualized network functions (NFs), whether implemented in software or hardware, provided that the implementation and characteristics of the underlying hardware are known. The availability of a unified modeling approach for VNF and NF is instrumental in the integration of middleboxes in an NFV infrastructure [2], which is important in a transition phase and for specific applications where a dedicated or specialized hardware platform is necessary for a specific NF to satisfy performance requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%