2011
DOI: 10.5194/bg-8-2999-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling nitrogen loading in a small watershed in southwest China using a DNDC model with hydrological enhancements

Abstract: Abstract. The degradation of water quality has been observed worldwide, and inputs of nitrogen (N), along with other nutrients, play a key role in the process of contamination. The quantification of N loading from non-point sources at a watershed scale has long been a challenge. Processbased models have been developed to address this problem. Because N loading from non-point sources result from interactions between biogeochemical and hydrological processes, a model framework must include both types of processe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agreed with the range of 7-19% observed at a site in the same region (Cai et al, 2002). At YT, the annual nitrogen losses via NH 3 volatilization given by all of the models accounted for 12-29% of the applied nitrogen, which were in accordance with the value of 24% previously simulated with the modified 92 version of DNDC in the Yanting catchment (Deng et al, 2011a). Compared with the observed NO 3 − leaching from same soil depth, the DNDC95 and LDNDC simulations of the annual loss rates of applied nitrogen in the NO 3 − leaching pathway tended to be lower at YJ (2-4% versus a range of 3-12% in Liu et al, 2012) and higher at HT (4-9% versus 0.3% as reported by Li et al, 2014), whereas the IAP-N-GAS simulations of 15-18% were higher at both sites.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 83%
“…These results agreed with the range of 7-19% observed at a site in the same region (Cai et al, 2002). At YT, the annual nitrogen losses via NH 3 volatilization given by all of the models accounted for 12-29% of the applied nitrogen, which were in accordance with the value of 24% previously simulated with the modified 92 version of DNDC in the Yanting catchment (Deng et al, 2011a). Compared with the observed NO 3 − leaching from same soil depth, the DNDC95 and LDNDC simulations of the annual loss rates of applied nitrogen in the NO 3 − leaching pathway tended to be lower at YJ (2-4% versus a range of 3-12% in Liu et al, 2012) and higher at HT (4-9% versus 0.3% as reported by Li et al, 2014), whereas the IAP-N-GAS simulations of 15-18% were higher at both sites.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some models based on hydrology are commonly used to predict nutrient loadings in watershed scale, such as SWAT (Wang et al, 2014a) and MIKE SHE (Vansteenkiste et al, 2013). There are also several nutrient-loading prediction models, which include components to simulate not only hydrological processes but also nutrient transport and transformation, such as the Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model (Deng et al, 2011) and STICS soil-crop model (Jego et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the phenological growth model for crops in DNDC are still in the code but are commented out, and a simpler GDD-based model is employed; the leaf area index becomes an estimated model output and is not involved in crop growth simulation in the model. A total of 63 crop types can now be simulated in cropping systems in the model, including fallow, maize, winter wheat, soybean, legume hay, non-legume hay, spring wheat, sugarcane, barley, oats, alfalfa, sorghum, cotton, rye, vegetables, papaya, potato, beet, paddy rice, and banana Deng et al, 2011a;Li et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Plant Growth Sub-model Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) DNDC also provides tools to quantify the uncertainties for site or regional simulations. With the Monte Carlo approach at the site or grid cell scale, and with the MSF (most sensitive factor) method at regional scale, the uncertainties produced from the model simulations can be quantified (Deng et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%