2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of agent-based complex network under cyber-violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where α(t) increases with time t and 0 <α ≤ 1. μ is used to illustrate the impact index of α(t), and it is usually equal to 4. β denotes the evolution rate, and β ∈ [1,4]. c represents the opinion decay time and is ranged from 10 to 30. erefore, after introducing parameter α, the opinion update modeling for the ordinary agent i is as follows:…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where α(t) increases with time t and 0 <α ≤ 1. μ is used to illustrate the impact index of α(t), and it is usually equal to 4. β denotes the evolution rate, and β ∈ [1,4]. c represents the opinion decay time and is ranged from 10 to 30. erefore, after introducing parameter α, the opinion update modeling for the ordinary agent i is as follows:…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, as discussed above, "public opinion reversal" involves minor agents persuading the majority to change opinions. e size of agents (or nodes) is n � 1000 in the social system simulated here according to the literature [1]. Each individual agent i has a state value of initial opinion, and let x i ∈ [−1, 1].…”
Section: Simulation Scenario and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, an improved opinion dynamics model was advanced for understanding the evolution laws of reversal of online public opinion from the perspective of statistical physics [9,47]. (2) In the online public opinion structure reversal of NIMBY conflict event, the participants impaired from a policy were less and less satisfied with this imposed distribution pattern.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%