2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of alternative testing strategies to demonstrate freedom from Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection in test-negative dairy herds in the Republic of Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from the Irish pilot programme (2013-2016), a stochastic simulation model was developed to examine the impact of alternative testing strategies on confidence of herd freedom, accounting for the risk attributable to stock introductions from the general population of herds. This work found that a single annual herd ELISA test (milk or serum) of cattle ≥2 or ≥ 3 years could achieve adequate confidence within a reasonable timeframe [9]. This scenario provides a more practical strategy than that used in the pilot programme in Ireland, where biannual milk testing was used.…”
Section: Assurance Testingmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using data from the Irish pilot programme (2013-2016), a stochastic simulation model was developed to examine the impact of alternative testing strategies on confidence of herd freedom, accounting for the risk attributable to stock introductions from the general population of herds. This work found that a single annual herd ELISA test (milk or serum) of cattle ≥2 or ≥ 3 years could achieve adequate confidence within a reasonable timeframe [9]. This scenario provides a more practical strategy than that used in the pilot programme in Ireland, where biannual milk testing was used.…”
Section: Assurance Testingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Once these objectives had been agreed, the narrative review of control programmes was adjusted to consider programmes with similar objectives, with particular consideration of control options, and of challenges and constraints to programme credibility and sustainability. Further, two modelling studies were specifically commissioned by AHI to assess testing methods used to demonstrate confidence of freedom in herds [9] and to evaluate a range of national surveillance strategies for the detection of infected herds [10]. Collectively, this information was used to inform recommendations to the JDIG on the design and structure of a credible and sustainable Irish Johne's disease control programme.…”
Section: The Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to these potential differences in production systems, we must consider that the spread of MAP in a Swedish herd could be different from what this model predicts and therefore augment the uncertainty of the final model estimates. Others have also modelled the spread of MAP including a highly detailed mechanistic within-herd model ( Kirkeby et al, 2016 ) and other compartments models that include a between herd spread ( Beaunée et al, 2015 ; Magombedze et al, 2013 ) as well as scenario tree models of surveillance efficacy ( Meyer et al, 2018 ; Frössling et al, 2013 ). These models and approaches were considered for the current work but the structures could not readily be used in the SimInf model framework in order to the include within- and between-herd animal movement events as was done in the current work to precisely reflect the Swedish cattle industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%