2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of analytical peaks: Peaks properties and basic peak functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several peak functions are potentially useful for modeling soil profile data. Comprehensive lists of candidate functions can be found in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964), Systat (2002), and Romanenko et al (2006). Many peak functions are related by common components, can be generalized to a mother function, or are part of a family of functions, such as extreme value functions.…”
Section: Asymmetric Peak Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several peak functions are potentially useful for modeling soil profile data. Comprehensive lists of candidate functions can be found in Abramowitz and Stegun (1964), Systat (2002), and Romanenko et al (2006). Many peak functions are related by common components, can be generalized to a mother function, or are part of a family of functions, such as extreme value functions.…”
Section: Asymmetric Peak Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two close anodic signals were present, peaks were deconvoluted using the Microcal Origin 7.0 software including the peak fitting module. It consists in a math- ematical treatment of the overall signal which is decomposed in a sum of Gaussian peaks associated to each electrochemical reaction [25].…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accurate way to express asymmetry of a peak is by application of two separate mathematical equations for ascending and descending sections of the signal (split functions) [48,74,75]. This procedure, however, is not very convenient since requires a very careful selection of the fitting constraints.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%