1996
DOI: 10.1021/bp960002g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Axial-Flow Hollow Fiber Cell Culture Bioreactors

Abstract: A review of the mathematical modeling of axial-flow hollow fiber cell bioreactors is presented. The models cover the range of diffusion-limited to convective-flow dominant nutrient transport conditions. Mass transport limitations inherent in the axial-flow bioreactor design are illustrated with model calculations. Simulation results further demonstrate the importance of convective nutrient transport to the cell growth region. These model developments were restricted to the transport and consumption of small su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starling flow can theoretically provide more oxygen to diffusion-limited bioreactors (Schonberg and Belfort, 1987). However, for "tight" ultrafiltrative membranes, or for bioreactors at packed cell densities, this convective contribution is likely not significant compared to the diffusive oxygen flux (Piret and Cooney, 1991;Brotherton and Chau, 1996). The Starling flow may actually be detrimental to cell growth since the proteins have a tendency to be pushed to the distal end of the EC space (Piret and Cooney, 1990a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starling flow can theoretically provide more oxygen to diffusion-limited bioreactors (Schonberg and Belfort, 1987). However, for "tight" ultrafiltrative membranes, or for bioreactors at packed cell densities, this convective contribution is likely not significant compared to the diffusive oxygen flux (Piret and Cooney, 1991;Brotherton and Chau, 1996). The Starling flow may actually be detrimental to cell growth since the proteins have a tendency to be pushed to the distal end of the EC space (Piret and Cooney, 1990a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Starling flow may actually be detrimental to cell growth since the proteins have a tendency to be pushed to the distal end of the EC space (Piret and Cooney, 1990a). The overall conclusion is that optimization of hollow fiber bioreactors requires some method of EC convection that does not cause inhomogeneities of the cell and protein distribution in the EC space (Brotherton and Chau, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea was originally introduced to describe capillaries in human tissues (Krogh 1919) and now is a common approach in efforts to model HFBRs (Brotherton and Chau 1996;Hay et al, 2001;Piret and Cooney 1991;Ye et al, 2006). The model considers one fiber surrounded by an annulus of ECS and by assuming that each fiber is identical and arranged in a regular hexagonal pattern, a bundle consisting of an arbitrary number of fibers can be described ( Fig.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is valid here as radial convection through the membrane can be assumed to be negligible (Kundu and Cohen 2001). It is also assumed that due to the low Reynolds numbers involved and small fiber radius to length ratio, entrance effects are negligible and the flow is laminar and fully developed (Brotherton and Chau 1996). Within the membrane, it is assumed that transport occurs by diffusion only (Eq.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Related work in the design of hollow-fiber bioreactors has also examined similar parameters. 16 Often, the design objective in these devices is to maximize the number of cells per reactor under the constraint of a given perfusion pressure or flow profile. 17 Previous work by Baskaran and colleagues used computational methods to maximize the surface area of the vasculature in a model scaffold while holding the total vascular volume constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%