2023
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2022.3227289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Current-Driven End-Effect Force Ripple in Air-Cored Linear Synchronous Motor With Multiple Modular Stators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to simple structure and high thrust density, permanent magnet synchronous linear motor (PMSLM) [1] have attracted much attention in high-velocity and precise drives, which have been widely applied in railway [2], logistics and distribution [3], electromagnetic launch [4], industrial manufacturing [5] and so on. Despite these advantages, the transient performance and disturbance rejection performance of the PMSLM system are constrained by end effects, cogging effects, parameter perturbation, sensors errors, dead zone of the inverter, and load disturbance [6][7][8]. To overcome the above shortcomings, a lot of advanced control methods and disturbance rejection compensation strategies have been proposed, such as adaptive control [9], sliding mode control (SMC) [10], H-∞ control, model predictive control (MPC) [11], extended state observer (ESO) [12], sliding mode observer (SMO), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to simple structure and high thrust density, permanent magnet synchronous linear motor (PMSLM) [1] have attracted much attention in high-velocity and precise drives, which have been widely applied in railway [2], logistics and distribution [3], electromagnetic launch [4], industrial manufacturing [5] and so on. Despite these advantages, the transient performance and disturbance rejection performance of the PMSLM system are constrained by end effects, cogging effects, parameter perturbation, sensors errors, dead zone of the inverter, and load disturbance [6][7][8]. To overcome the above shortcomings, a lot of advanced control methods and disturbance rejection compensation strategies have been proposed, such as adaptive control [9], sliding mode control (SMC) [10], H-∞ control, model predictive control (MPC) [11], extended state observer (ESO) [12], sliding mode observer (SMO), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%