2007
DOI: 10.1002/nag.672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of granular bed‐stone column‐improved soft soil

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present study pertains to the development of a mechanical model for predicting the behavior of granular bed-stone column-reinforced soft ground. The granular layer that has been placed over the stone column-reinforced soft soil has been idealized by the Pasternak shear layer. The saturated soft soil has been idealized by the Kelvin-Voigt model to represent its time-dependent behavior and the stone columns are idealized by stiffer Winkler springs. The nonlinear behavior of the granular fill has been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) and (10) respectively. The modulus of subgrade reaction of stone column is taken 6 times the modulus of subgrade reaction of the soil [3], where 6 is the ratio between E gp and E s . Linear analysis is considered.…”
Section: Comparison With Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(6) and (10) respectively. The modulus of subgrade reaction of stone column is taken 6 times the modulus of subgrade reaction of the soil [3], where 6 is the ratio between E gp and E s . Linear analysis is considered.…”
Section: Comparison With Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several literature pertaining to the behavior of footings resting on fully penetrated granular piles are found (e.g., [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. But, a little number of literature concerning the behavior of footings resting on floating granular piles are found (e.g., [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For s/d c ratio 5, the reduction of maximum settlement is 25% due to use geosynthetic layer, whereas the reduction is 20% in case of s/d c ratio 3. Studies show that differential settlement also increases with the increases of s/d c ratio (Deb 2008). The effect of s/d c ratio on stress concentration ratio has been shown in Fig.…”
Section: Without Geosynthetic Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Elshazly et al (2008) studied the reliability of conventional settlement evaluation for circular footings resting on group of stone columns. Considering plane strain condition, Deb (2008) developed a mechanical model for predicting the behavior of granular bed-stone column-reinforced soft ground.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%