2009
DOI: 10.2175/106143008x357110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Hydrogen Sulfide Oxidation in Concrete Corrosion Products from Sewer Pipes

Abstract: Abiotic and biotic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide related to concrete corrosion was studied in corrosion products originating from a sewer manhole. The concrete corrosion products were suspended in an acidic solution, mimicking the conditions in the pore water of corroded concrete. The removal of hydrogen sulfide and dissolved oxygen was measured in parallel in the suspension, upon which the suspension was sterilized and the measurement repeated. The results revealed the biotic oxidation to be fast compared wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
4
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected based on previous studies comparing biological and abiotic sulfide oxidation rates (e.g., Jørgensen et al, 1979;Jannasch Degassing rate , 1991;Jensen et al, 2009;Luther et al, 2011), sulfide removal by microbial oxidation is much faster in Frasassi streams than abiotic oxidation (Table 1). Our measured microbial oxidation rates are consistent with microsensor-based measurements of microbial sulfide oxidation in aphotic biofilms from a variety of other sulfidic environments, which can vary from 0.05 to 1.16 μmol m −2 s −1 (see compilation by Schwedt et al, 2011).…”
Section: Fate Of H 2 S In Frasassi Streamssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As expected based on previous studies comparing biological and abiotic sulfide oxidation rates (e.g., Jørgensen et al, 1979;Jannasch Degassing rate , 1991;Jensen et al, 2009;Luther et al, 2011), sulfide removal by microbial oxidation is much faster in Frasassi streams than abiotic oxidation (Table 1). Our measured microbial oxidation rates are consistent with microsensor-based measurements of microbial sulfide oxidation in aphotic biofilms from a variety of other sulfidic environments, which can vary from 0.05 to 1.16 μmol m −2 s −1 (see compilation by Schwedt et al, 2011).…”
Section: Fate Of H 2 S In Frasassi Streamssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This suggests the formation of a mixture of elemental sulfur and sulfur at a higher oxidation state than zero. This is in accordance with the findings of Jensen et al [18].…”
Section: Stoichiometrysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The growth kinetics were studied by suspending samples of concrete corrosion products in deionized water adjusted to pH 1 in order to mimic the acidic conditions found on corroded concrete [18]. The samples of corrosion products were collected from a pilot scale setup simulating a concrete gravity sewer with continuously dosing of hydrogen sulfide into the sewer atmosphere [20], and were thus expected to contain the microbial community responsible for the sulfuric acid production causing the corrosion.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common bacteria for biological oxidation are acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (Okabe et al 2007). The rate of biological oxidation is higher than chemical oxidation because the biological oxidation produces readily biodegradable elemental sulphur as its end product, while chemical oxidation's end product is predicted to have slowly biodegradable elemental sulphur (Jensen et al 2009). …”
Section: Odourmentioning
confidence: 99%