2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of indoor 222Rn distribution in ventilated room and resulting radiation doses measured in the respiratory tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the CFD results with other studies, Visnuprasad et al 23 and Zhuo et al 8 assumed ACH = 4.3 h −1 in the open-door scenario and the average indoor radon concentrations in their studies were reported to be 29 and 15 Bq m -3 , respectively, while in this study it was simulated to be 20 Bq m −3 , the results of which are given in Table 1 . The average indoor radon concentration reported by Rabi et al 12 was 49 Bq m −3 which assumed that ACH = 1 h −1 , in the closed-door scenario, while in this study the corresponding value was around 70 Bq m −3 .
Figure 5 Velocity distribution in the modelled test room in both scenarios at 2 different ventilation rates.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to compare the CFD results with other studies, Visnuprasad et al 23 and Zhuo et al 8 assumed ACH = 4.3 h −1 in the open-door scenario and the average indoor radon concentrations in their studies were reported to be 29 and 15 Bq m -3 , respectively, while in this study it was simulated to be 20 Bq m −3 , the results of which are given in Table 1 . The average indoor radon concentration reported by Rabi et al 12 was 49 Bq m −3 which assumed that ACH = 1 h −1 , in the closed-door scenario, while in this study the corresponding value was around 70 Bq m −3 .
Figure 5 Velocity distribution in the modelled test room in both scenarios at 2 different ventilation rates.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…For instance, Zhou et al applied the finite difference method to derive discrete equations before linking them to the commercial FU-JITSU/a-FLOW code to study the concentrations and their distributions of 222 Rn and 220 Rn as well as their progenies in a model room 8 . Rabi et al implemented a 222 Rn distribution inside a typical Moroccan room using Fortran software 12 . Chauhan et al and Agarwal et al in this regard also used the software Fluidyn MP based on the Finite Volume Method (FVM) 11 , 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the activity concentration of 220 Rn inside the chamber can be accurately predicted and simulated by using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique. In previous studies, CFD software was employed as a powerful analytical tool for studying the distributions of 222 Rn and 220 Rn inside dwellings 4,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . For example, Agarwal et al used CFD to assess the 220 Rn distribution in confined volumes in the presence of a forced flow, such as the delay volume used as a mitigation device 21,30 .…”
Section: Development Of a Thoron Calibration Chamber Based On Computa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium factor between radon and its descendants is a dimensionless parameter and is defined as follows [10]: F = ".$"%. & '".%$(.…”
Section: The Equilibrium Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional doses, weighted with factors assigned for the partition of radiation detriment, are summed to give a value of committed equivalent dose for the thoracic H Q j and extrathoracic H R j regions. According to the ICRP 66 [12], we have the following equations: H Q j = A SS H SS j + A TT H TT j + A /U H /U j (9) and H R j = A R $ H R $ j + A R V H R V j (10) where H SS j , H TT j and H /U j are the equivalent doses in the BB, bb and AI tissues of the thoracic region, respectively; H R $ j and H R V j are the equivalent doses in the ET 1 and ET 2 tissues of the extrathoracic region, respectively; A BB = 0.333, A TT = 0.333 and A AI = 0.333 are the weighting factors for the partition of radiation detriment for the BB, bb and AI tissues of the thoracic region, respectively, and A R $ = 0.001 and A R V = 1 are the weighting factors for the partition of radiation detriment for the ET 1 and ET 2 extrathoracic regions [12]. The annual effective dose (mSv y -1 h -1 exposure) due to radon decay products inside the Hammam was evaluated by using the following equation:…”
Section: Determination Of Annual Committed Equivalent Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%