2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of observed mineral dust aerosols in the arctic and the impact on winter season low‐level clouds

Abstract: [1] Mineral dust aerosol is the main ice nucleus (IN) in the Arctic. Observed dust concentrations at Alert, Canada, are lowest in winter and summer and highest in spring and autumn. In this study, we simulate transport and deposition of dust in a global chemical transport model. The model predicts the spring maximum caused by natural dust from desert sources in Asia and Sahara but underestimates the observations in autumn. Both natural and pollution sources contribute to the wintertime dust burden, as suggeste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(183 reference statements)
2
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the high-latitude underestimation is more severe near the surface than at upper levels of the atmosphere. The low dust bias near high-latitude surface is also shown in the modeled dust concentration comparisons with ground observations at the Alert site (Fan, 2013; Figure S2 in the supporting information). Dust concentration in EAM v1 is about 1 order of magnitude lower than observations, whereas that in EAM v0 is more than 2 orders of magnitude lower.…”
Section: Dust Extinction Vertical Profilessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, the high-latitude underestimation is more severe near the surface than at upper levels of the atmosphere. The low dust bias near high-latitude surface is also shown in the modeled dust concentration comparisons with ground observations at the Alert site (Fan, 2013; Figure S2 in the supporting information). Dust concentration in EAM v1 is about 1 order of magnitude lower than observations, whereas that in EAM v0 is more than 2 orders of magnitude lower.…”
Section: Dust Extinction Vertical Profilessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…First, according to the observations, our model is able to capture the mean dust concentration at station Alert. However, the distinct increase of dust concentrations observed in autumn is not captured in any of the 3 years of simulations, similar to other model simulations [ Fan , ]. Peak timing in the activity of dust sources varies per region [e.g., Bullard et al, ] and while some sources are active throughout the year, others distinctly peak in a particular season due to a combination of several factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus likely that a local dust source, mostly active in autumn, is missing in simulations of dust surface concentrations at Alert. Also note that dust concentration values at Alert in autumn appear considerably smaller in a different observational data set for the years 2000 to 2006 [Fan, 2013].…”
Section: Transport Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In some cases this may be due to the vastness of the uninhabited areas of the northern Arctic and Antarctica; in other cases it may be that dust was detected but not attributed to local sources due to lack of awareness of dust originating from high latitudes. For example, while reexamining data collected in North Canada during the 1970s and 1980s [ Barrie , ; Barrie and Barrie , ] for a study on intercontinental aerosol transport, Fan [] noted an unexplained increase in dust observations at Alert, Canada (82°30′05″N, 62°20′20″W) during the fall months. It is likely that the fall peak at Alert and at other locations in Alaska was caused by local dust entrainment [ Polissar et al , ; Stone et al , ].…”
Section: Challenges In Understanding and Quantifying High‐latitude Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%