2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of PCM melting: Analysis of discrepancy between numerical and experimental results and energy storage performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth and fifth term on the right‐hand side of “ x ” and “ y ” momentum equations, respectively, is the Darcy source term . The constant C depicts the reflects the solidification morphology . There is a substantial literature which discusses the effect of the mushy constant on the accuracy of enthalpy‐porosity technique and the numerical predictions .…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fourth and fifth term on the right‐hand side of “ x ” and “ y ” momentum equations, respectively, is the Darcy source term . The constant C depicts the reflects the solidification morphology . There is a substantial literature which discusses the effect of the mushy constant on the accuracy of enthalpy‐porosity technique and the numerical predictions .…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latent heat content of each cell is updated for predicting of the liquid fraction. Therefore, an iterative updating scheme, as detailed in references is employed and as follows: ΔHPn+1=ΔHPn+{}anormalpanormalp0λ[]hpnG1ΔHPn …”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations