2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of sand particle crushing in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests using the discrete element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic mechanical properties at high strain rate (10 2 -10 4 s −1 ) can be accomplished using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB); more details about the SHPB can be found in Refs. [36][37][38]. Figure 3 is the illustration of the SHPB.…”
Section: Structure Design and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic mechanical properties at high strain rate (10 2 -10 4 s −1 ) can be accomplished using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB); more details about the SHPB can be found in Refs. [36][37][38]. Figure 3 is the illustration of the SHPB.…”
Section: Structure Design and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a unidimensional simulation of compression of soils, d min , which is also called comminution limit, was set proportional to d 50 by using a d min /d 50 of 0.25 [38,39]. Utilizing the same criteria, in a model of a split Hopkinson pressure bar test, a ratio of 0.22 was selected [40]. With this relationship and a feeding size of F50 = 122 mm, the minimum particle size should be d min = 26.84 mm.…”
Section: Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%