2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of single catalyst particle in cathode of PEM fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the 4.9 nm Pt3Co particles on the carbon support would be ~2 times closer to each other (using the metric of geometric distance) than the 8.1 nm Pt3Co particles and ~4 times closer when compared to the 14.8 nm particles. Fewer particles in electrodes could result in fewer access points for ORR, and lower net oxygen concentration at the catalyst surface, resulting in lower performance with larger particles [39]. The effect of this catalyst particle spacing is expected to be greater on the performance in air than in oxygen, as seen in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This suggests that the 4.9 nm Pt3Co particles on the carbon support would be ~2 times closer to each other (using the metric of geometric distance) than the 8.1 nm Pt3Co particles and ~4 times closer when compared to the 14.8 nm particles. Fewer particles in electrodes could result in fewer access points for ORR, and lower net oxygen concentration at the catalyst surface, resulting in lower performance with larger particles [39]. The effect of this catalyst particle spacing is expected to be greater on the performance in air than in oxygen, as seen in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, by introducing a way to modulate the current transfer density, it allows for better prediction [1]. Various models can be found in the literature [161][162][163].…”
Section: Transport Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/ . In another study, the effective thermal conductivity was, in a similar way based on the pore-level dimensionless temperature distribution, evaluated by the one-equation average model describing the conduction heat transfer in the porous media [25]: (5) where T 1 and T 2 are the temperatures at the top and bottom walls, respectively, l is the length. The obtained effective conductivity is presented as a function of the solid and fl uid conductivities, and this value was compared with the extreme ones from parallel and serial structures at the same porosity.…”
Section: Effective Thermal Conductivity and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various heat transfer processes appearing in heterogeneously distributed pores and solid matrices are strongly coupled with catalytic reactions and charge (proton/ions and electrons) transfer, e.g. in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%