The Engineering of Sport 6 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-46051-2_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the Ski-Snow Contact for a Carved Turn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The associated snow contact forces are implemented. The given work is an improvement to prior work (Casolo et al., ; Nordt, ; Nordt et al., , b; Casolo & Lorenzi, ; Mössner, ; Mössner et al., ; Heinrich et al., ; Federolf, ; Federolf et al., , b), which investigated either quasi‐static balance situations or simpler (elastic) snow contact models. The contact forces are given by one‐dimensional sub‐models that describe penetration (snow hardness, H ), shearing (failure shear stress, S ), and friction (coefficient of kinetic friction, μ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The associated snow contact forces are implemented. The given work is an improvement to prior work (Casolo et al., ; Nordt, ; Nordt et al., , b; Casolo & Lorenzi, ; Mössner, ; Mössner et al., ; Heinrich et al., ; Federolf, ; Federolf et al., , b), which investigated either quasi‐static balance situations or simpler (elastic) snow contact models. The contact forces are given by one‐dimensional sub‐models that describe penetration (snow hardness, H ), shearing (failure shear stress, S ), and friction (coefficient of kinetic friction, μ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A first step to overcome the limitations present in our model is the dynamic approach presented by Mössner et al [28], who reported good agreement with sled measurements that create a steady-state turn. To overcome the condition that the ski has to be in a steady state, a dynamic simulation that includes a calculation of how the groove in the snow is formed would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A limitation of most of these simulation approaches is a severe simplification of the ski-snow interaction processes. To our knowledge there are only two simulation approaches that incorporate the plasticity of the snow deformation [27,28]. Only a small number of the simulation methods described in the literature have been validated and none with data from an actual carved turn executed by a skier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Although due to the snow plasticity, we would expect the same penetration depth at the ski tail, it should still decrease towards the shovel.) If some degree of skidding was involved then one would expect to find a larger value of R instead [10,14] . For simplicity, we ignore these caveats here.…”
Section: A the Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%