2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the structure-specific kinetics of abiotic, dark reduction of Hg(II) complexed by O/N and S functional groups in humic acids while accounting for time-dependent structural rearrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
8
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are only a few reports on the Hg contamination in Chinese estuaries, where high levels of Hg commonly are encountered, caused by the rapid industrial developments (Wang et al, 2009, Luo et al, 2012Gao et al, 2014;Ci et al, 2011). It is well known that DOM regulates Hg dynamics in aquatic environments through its chemical bonding to reduced sulfur groups (Ravichandran, 2004;Skyllberg et al, 2006), by its induction of photoreactions (Jeremiason et al, 2015), and by its control of dark redox transformations (Gu et al, 2011, Jiang et al, 2015. Additionally, DOM plays a dual role (i.e., enhancement or inhibition) in the production of MeHg due to its effect on Hg speciation and bioavailability (Graham et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2014;Hsu-Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few reports on the Hg contamination in Chinese estuaries, where high levels of Hg commonly are encountered, caused by the rapid industrial developments (Wang et al, 2009, Luo et al, 2012Gao et al, 2014;Ci et al, 2011). It is well known that DOM regulates Hg dynamics in aquatic environments through its chemical bonding to reduced sulfur groups (Ravichandran, 2004;Skyllberg et al, 2006), by its induction of photoreactions (Jeremiason et al, 2015), and by its control of dark redox transformations (Gu et al, 2011, Jiang et al, 2015. Additionally, DOM plays a dual role (i.e., enhancement or inhibition) in the production of MeHg due to its effect on Hg speciation and bioavailability (Graham et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2014;Hsu-Kim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a and b). The latter tracer can be assumed to rapidly bind (within seconds) (Hintelmann and Harris, 2004; Jiang, et al, 2015) to easily available adsorption sites (O and N) in the sediment POM matrix, which are much more abundant than any pore water DOM ligands, and with time migrate to less available, but more thermodynamically stable, POM binding sites (reduced sulfur sites) (Jiang, et al, 2015). In contrast to our results, adsorption of Hg II complexed to organic matter (OM) derived from a peat soil has previously been demonstrated to reduce the availability of Hg II for methylation in a brackish water sediment (Jonsson, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more traditional methylation assays, where Hg II (aq) is used as the methylation tracer, the Hg II (aq) added is assumed to quickly partition to easily available binding sites in the sediment (Hintelmann, et al, 2000; Hintelmann and Harris, 2004; Jiang, et al, 2015) and with time migrate to less available and more stable binding sites thereby adopting an overall binding strength resembling that of ambient Hg (Hintelmann, et al, 2000; Jonsson, et al, 2012). If our assumption was incorrect, a rapid increase in the concentration of MeHg formed from the Hg II (aq) tracer would be expected within the first minutes of such incubation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the thiol % was not determined for the used Leonardite HA, a range of thiol % was available in the literature for various humic acids [51][52][53][54][55][56][57], mainly determined from XAS records. This range varied from 10% to 50% of S tot as thiol groups.…”
Section: Fitting the Binding Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the only S tot amount was not sufficient to determine the thiol concentrations in humic substances. The concentrations of thiol groups varied from 1% to 46.9% [51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. To better understand the binding of As(III) to thiol groups, it is therefore absolutely necessary to determine thiol concentrations.…”
Section: Implications Of the Direct Binding Mechanism Evidencedmentioning
confidence: 99%