2001
DOI: 10.1109/6144.926376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the thermal and hydraulic performance of plate fin, strip fin, and pin fin heat sinks-influence of flow bypass

Abstract: Tests have been conducted in a wind tunnel with seven types of heat sinks including plate fin, strip fin, and pin fin heat sinks. In the case of strip fin, and pin fin heat sinks, both in-line and staggered arrays have been studied. The pin fin heat sinks had circular and square cross-sections. For each type, tests were run with fin heights ( ) of 10, 15, and 20 mm while the heat sink width ( ) was kept constant and equal to 52.8 mm. In total, 42 different heat sinks were tested. The width of the wind tunnel d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
69
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pin fin heat sinks (PFHSs) can be an effective alternative to plate fin heat sinks since they have the advantage of hindering the development of the thermal boundary layer on smooth surfaces responsible for limiting the heat transfer rates in plate fin designs, Zhou & Catton [3]. Several previous investigations of heat transfer and pressure drops of PFHSs have demonstrated clearly their superiority over plate fin designs and have attempted to optimise these by studying, for 3 example, the effect of pin cross-sectional shape Soodphakdee et al [6], Jonsson & Moshfeghor [7] and the benefits of combining plate and pin fins within compound heat sinks, Yang & Peng [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pin fin heat sinks (PFHSs) can be an effective alternative to plate fin heat sinks since they have the advantage of hindering the development of the thermal boundary layer on smooth surfaces responsible for limiting the heat transfer rates in plate fin designs, Zhou & Catton [3]. Several previous investigations of heat transfer and pressure drops of PFHSs have demonstrated clearly their superiority over plate fin designs and have attempted to optimise these by studying, for 3 example, the effect of pin cross-sectional shape Soodphakdee et al [6], Jonsson & Moshfeghor [7] and the benefits of combining plate and pin fins within compound heat sinks, Yang & Peng [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jonsson and Moshfegh [23], for example, studied the performance of strip fins, square pins, circular pins, and plate fin with in-line and staggered arrangements. Using a coarse arrangement of strip fins with AR=5.3, the pressure drop in their experiments was substantially lower than for a denser arrangement of pins but with a similar thermal resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They developed a corelation relating heat transfer performance to Reynolds number and other important characteristic parameters. Jonsson et al 22,23 also developed an empirical correlation for different fin designs. Their correlation predicts the Nusselt number and the dimensionless pressure drop and takes into account the influence of duct height, duct width, fin height, fin thickness, and fin-fin spacing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rizzi et al 20,21 and Jonsson et al 22,23 investigated the effects of bypass on heat transfer and pressure drop in CPFHS, SPFHS, and PPFHS experimentally. Rizzi et al [20,21] developed a number of data reduction parameters and procedures using scaling for heterogeneous media suggested by volume averaging theory.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%