2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of wheat soaking using two artificial neural networks (MLP and RBF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the tests performed in this investigation, the authors found out that the application of activation functions with the arrangement of 3-19-2 for both of the responses in the Logarithm-sigmoid design and 3-16-16-2 and 3-22-2, respectively, in SG and WL in the Hyperbolic-tangent design exhibited the highest reliability. The results of this investigation are in agreement with the results obtained in some similar research including synthetic prediction of mass transfer in the process of osmotic dehydration of pumpkin and modelling of water absorption of wheat with perceptron neural network and radial basis function performed by (Kashaninejad et al, 2009;Mokhtarian and Shafafi Zenuzian, 2012). In other words, the interpretation of the figures ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Based on the tests performed in this investigation, the authors found out that the application of activation functions with the arrangement of 3-19-2 for both of the responses in the Logarithm-sigmoid design and 3-16-16-2 and 3-22-2, respectively, in SG and WL in the Hyperbolic-tangent design exhibited the highest reliability. The results of this investigation are in agreement with the results obtained in some similar research including synthetic prediction of mass transfer in the process of osmotic dehydration of pumpkin and modelling of water absorption of wheat with perceptron neural network and radial basis function performed by (Kashaninejad et al, 2009;Mokhtarian and Shafafi Zenuzian, 2012). In other words, the interpretation of the figures ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…First, is the number of hidden layers and second is the number of neurons in each hidden layer. Since almost all of the problems in neural network modeling could be solved with one hidden layer (Chen et al 2001;Kashaninejad et al 2008;Mohebbi et al 2007;Movagharnejad and Nikzad 2007;Ochoa-Martínez and Ayala-Apaonte 2007;Mitra et al 2009), an ANN with three layers was used in this research. In addition, using too many hidden layers may lead to problem of data overfitting, affecting the system's generalization capability (Abdullah et al 2006).…”
Section: Image Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recentemente, novas técnicas, como redes neurais (Bucene & Rodrigues, 2004;Alvarez, 2009;Kashaninejad et al, 2009), sistemas de inferência nebulosos (fuzzy) (Carvalho et al, 2009), computação evolucionária e sistemas híbridos (Schultz & Wieland, 1997) têm sido empregadas para desenvolver modelos de predição e estimar parâmetros. Essas técnicas têm utilidade em diversas áreas de pesquisa, porque são adequadas para a análise de sistemas com incertezas, sendo usadas como alternativas aos métodos estatísticos (Yilmaz & Kaynar, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified