28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Wing Drag Reductions Due to Structural Dynamics in Atmospheric Gusts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a MAV flying in the ABL, the turbulence is comparatively stronger and, as pointed out by Langelaan and Bramesfeld [22], it opens up the possibility for greater energy gains according to Phillips' theory. More recent work has explored this possibility for smaller UAVs, of conventional wing tail configuration, either by using active control methods to optimally adjust the vehicles instantaneous angle of attack for maximum energy gain [21][22][23], or by tuning aeroelasticity and structural dynamics for the wing to naturally flex in order to optimally harvest the energy [24,25]. Another area of energy harvesting in atmospheric winds, which has some similarities to the energy gain in turbulence, is the phenomenon called dynamic soaring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a MAV flying in the ABL, the turbulence is comparatively stronger and, as pointed out by Langelaan and Bramesfeld [22], it opens up the possibility for greater energy gains according to Phillips' theory. More recent work has explored this possibility for smaller UAVs, of conventional wing tail configuration, either by using active control methods to optimally adjust the vehicles instantaneous angle of attack for maximum energy gain [21][22][23], or by tuning aeroelasticity and structural dynamics for the wing to naturally flex in order to optimally harvest the energy [24,25]. Another area of energy harvesting in atmospheric winds, which has some similarities to the energy gain in turbulence, is the phenomenon called dynamic soaring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.4a. Ironside et al [19] used such an approach model the aeroelastic response of a sailplane wing configuration. The advantage of the explicit approach is its simplicity to implement and relatively low computational cost; it can, however, be subject to stability issues at larger time step sizes.…”
Section: Implicit/explicit Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was used in a similar manner by Ironside et al [19] to investigate the aeroelastic response of a high performance sailplane wing. The finite difference method discretizes the structure into several nodal grid points; at each of these grid points, the equations of motion are solved and a response of the entire wing is formulated.…”
Section: Explicit Finite Difference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for the atmospheric disturbance effect on roll and yaw motions has been proposed by Ringnes and Frost [19] based on well-known Prandtl lifting-line theory. Moreover, besides the already described methods of gust energy extraction using active control, some benefits could be achieved using a passive approach that makes use of the longitudinal stability of the aircraft and the dynamic response of the structure, particularly of the wing by Ironside et al [20,21] and Mai [22].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%