Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2854946.2854981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Optimal Switching Behavior

Abstract: Recently developed retrieval effectiveness measures have incorporated models of user behavior, but have limited themselves to predicting user performance over a single query and response. Accurate prediction of user performance with search systems must incorporate a means to model how users switch between different information sources. For example, a search session may consist of multiple queries with the user making decisions of when to switch from evaluating the current result list to a new result list produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By estimating the expected benet for each state, they were able to tell the user at which rank it is better to formulate a query (instead of going further down the result list). Similar to this, Smucker and Clarke [13] modelled the switching behaviour of users engaging with ranked lists which provide dierent levels of gain and show at what point it is optimal to 'switch'.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By estimating the expected benet for each state, they were able to tell the user at which rank it is better to formulate a query (instead of going further down the result list). Similar to this, Smucker and Clarke [13] modelled the switching behaviour of users engaging with ranked lists which provide dierent levels of gain and show at what point it is optimal to 'switch'.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By considering the SERP as a whole, this provides a way to model abandonment within the search process, rather than assuming that a searcher will assess the first snippet specifically. This therefore marks a departure from assumptions encoded within many Information Retrieval (IR) models and measures, such as P @k, RBP [24], and INST [1,23,31]. The motivation for including this additional decision point stems from empirical research (i.e.…”
Section: Updating the Complex Searcher Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,32] • should a user examine many documents and issue few queries, or vice versa? [2,4] In describing the different models, we will explore and explain how different parameters affect the decisions at play.…”
Section: Introduction and The Economics Of Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%