Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2020/483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Perception Errors towards Robust Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles

Abstract: Sensing and Perception (S&P) is a crucial component of an autonomous system (such as a robot), especially when deployed in highly dynamic environments where it is required to react to unexpected situations. This is particularly true in case of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) driving on public roads. However, the current evaluation metrics for perception algorithms are typically designed to measure their accuracy per se and do not account for their impact on the decision making subsystem(s). This limitati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the training data for the surrogate detector would be D = {s i , ỹi } k i=1 , and although we have defined f as a function of all ground-truth objects in the scene, in this paper our implementation factorises over each agent in the scene and acts on a single agent basis. This results in a surrogate model which by design cannot predict False Positive detections, as is the case in most of the perception error model literature (see [29,30,12,42,21]). Choosing a more general surrogate model would avoid this limitation, however, we consider this out of the scope of the present work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the training data for the surrogate detector would be D = {s i , ỹi } k i=1 , and although we have defined f as a function of all ground-truth objects in the scene, in this paper our implementation factorises over each agent in the scene and acts on a single agent basis. This results in a surrogate model which by design cannot predict False Positive detections, as is the case in most of the perception error model literature (see [29,30,12,42,21]). Choosing a more general surrogate model would avoid this limitation, however, we consider this out of the scope of the present work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ref. [65] models perception errors while considering the effect they have on robust decision making. In the context of validation of sensor models, Ref.…”
Section: Relevance For Safety-oriented Perception Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impact analysis of perceptual errors on the downstream driving function has also already been described in Ref. [65].…”
Section: Uncertainty Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation Environment This work presents simulation-based perception testing for autonomous vehicles to evaluate perception object detection systems [1]. This work introduces a comprehensive study to evaluate closed-loop simulation testing for autonomous driving models that include deep learning detection modules learning [1] . LGSVL Road Scenarios [1] In addition, the perception system imports object detection algorithms to simulate the testing scenarios.…”
Section: Experiments Establishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work introduces a comprehensive study to evaluate closed-loop simulation testing for autonomous driving models that include deep learning detection modules learning [1] . LGSVL Road Scenarios [1] In addition, the perception system imports object detection algorithms to simulate the testing scenarios. In the meantime, it involves an evaluation suite to describe scenarios in a virtual environment.…”
Section: Experiments Establishmentioning
confidence: 99%