2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04206-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling plastic anisotropy evolution of AISI 304 steel sheets by a polynomial yield function

Abstract: In this study, a numerical model for the evolution of plastic anisotropy is investigated for the purpose of stamping method design by Finite Element (FE) analysis and proved experimentally via process simulations of a cold-rolled austenitic stainless steel (AISI 304) sheet. The plastic anisotropy of the sheets is described with a fourth-order homogenous polynomial yield function and this modelling approach is enhanced by plastic strain dependent material coefficients. Tensile tests of coupon specimens taken al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the experimental tests (see Figure 5), the considered steel exhibits an anisotropic behaviour which is demonstrated by the variation of the mechanical properties with the in-plane direction. 31,[50][51][52] It is noticed that the hardening curves corresponding to the directions 00°, 30°a nd 45°from the rolling direction had extremely similar mechanical properties up to 20.8% in strain. In addition, the values of yield strength and maximum tensile strength were close.…”
Section: Macro-tensile Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the experimental tests (see Figure 5), the considered steel exhibits an anisotropic behaviour which is demonstrated by the variation of the mechanical properties with the in-plane direction. 31,[50][51][52] It is noticed that the hardening curves corresponding to the directions 00°, 30°a nd 45°from the rolling direction had extremely similar mechanical properties up to 20.8% in strain. In addition, the values of yield strength and maximum tensile strength were close.…”
Section: Macro-tensile Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An optimization method was applied to determine the coefficients a 6 and a 8 with an objective function similar to Eq. ( 52), based on the error between predicted stress ratios and r-values and the corresponding the tensile experimental points of TUAT [80] at 15°, 30°,45°,60° and 75°. An equal weight was chosen for Lankford coefficients and yield limits.…”
Section: Th Order Polynomial Model (Hompol4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 80. Comparison between experimental and predicted results with shell elements and Hill48 criterion with associated flow rule (data set Table22line 1) and non-associated flow rule (data set computed by Eqs (71).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They investigated the anisotropic behavior of AISI 304 stainless steel It is seen from the Figures 9 and 10 that the predicted thickness distributions and flange geometry matches well with the experimental results. Then, Sener et al [19] expanded the study [18] and studied the variation of anisotropy during plastic Experimental and predicted cup profiles from the fourth-order polynomial and Yld96 criteria for AA2090-T3 [14].…”
Section: Prediction Of Thickness Strains In Rectangular Cup Drawingmentioning
confidence: 99%