2014
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/04/t04002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling pulse characteristics in Xenon with NEST

Abstract: A comprehensive model for describing the characteristics of pulsed signals, generated by particle interactions in xenon detectors, is presented. An emphasis is laid on two-phase time projection chambers, but the models presented are also applicable to single phase detectors. In order to simulate the pulse shape due to primary scintillation light, the effects of the ratio of singlet and triplet dimer state populations, as well as their corresponding decay times, and the recombination time are incorporated into … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 50 to 600 V=cm field variation over the fiducial region relevant to this analysis, the average light yield for a 5 keV ER event falls by 15%, while average charge yield rises by the same amount. The scale of variation is less pronounced for lowerenergy ER events [32,33]. For a 5 keV NR event, the fieldinduced changes in light and charge yield are smaller, at the level of 5% [34].…”
Section: ∼10mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 50 to 600 V=cm field variation over the fiducial region relevant to this analysis, the average light yield for a 5 keV ER event falls by 15%, while average charge yield rises by the same amount. The scale of variation is less pronounced for lowerenergy ER events [32,33]. For a 5 keV NR event, the fieldinduced changes in light and charge yield are smaller, at the level of 5% [34].…”
Section: ∼10mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1) with that predicted by the response model, in the range of 0-50 phd, which roughly corresponds to an energy range of 0-10 keVee. Specific to each exposure segment, two model parameters are varied during these fits: the electric field magnitude, and the recombination fluctuation parameter F r (see [32,34,35,41]). Parameters that describe the detector as a whole (e.g., g 1 , electron extraction efficiency, and S2 gas gain), are allowed to vary while constrained to be equal for all exposure segments within a given date bin.…”
Section: Prl 118 021303 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46]), the electron drift speeds in liquid and gas, the electron extraction delay at the liquid surface, the (small) light travel time to the PMTs, and the singlet and triplet time constants characteristic of the excited molecular (excimer) states of xenon dimers. The last two contributions, plus the time it takes for ionization electrons to recombine with ions, also allows reproduction of the S1 pulse shape [47,48].…”
Section: Simulations: Luxsim a Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…V D. The ratio of excitons to ions is constant for ER interactions, n ex /n i = 0.2 [10,15,16]. Each exciton de-excites, emitting a 178-nm photon [17][18][19]. A fraction of the initial electron-ion pairs, r, recombine and form additional excitons.…”
Section: Energy Reconstruction and Signal Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%