Biocomputing '99 1998
DOI: 10.1142/9789814447300_0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Regulatory Networks With Weight Matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
206
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
206
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More detailed gene network models have been used (eg. [2]), as well as modeling the networks as differential equations [24] [11] or weight matrices [27]. In many of these models, the underlying gene network topology can be or is represented as a graph: nodes indicate genes, and directed labeled edges indicate gene regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed gene network models have been used (eg. [2]), as well as modeling the networks as differential equations [24] [11] or weight matrices [27]. In many of these models, the underlying gene network topology can be or is represented as a graph: nodes indicate genes, and directed labeled edges indicate gene regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative models based on linear models for gene regulatory networks like the weighted matrix model introduced and inferred by Weaver et al [22] consider the continuous level of gene expression. Another algorithm to infer quantitative models is the singular value decomposition method by Yeung et al [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRNs are biochemically dynamic systems to describe highly complex interactions among two main species of gene products: mRNA and proteins, in the interactive transcription and translation process, and they are always modeled by using dynamic systems. Several computational models have been applied to investigate the behaviors of GRNs: Boolean models (Somogyi and Sniegoski 1996;Weaver et al 1999), Bayesian network models (Friedman et al 2000;Hartemink et al 2002), Petri net models (Hardy and Robillard 2004;Chaouiya et al 2008), and the differential equation models (Smolen et al 2000;Bolouri and Davidson 2002;Chen and Aihara 2002;Chesi and Hung 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%