17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6957937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling risk anticipation and defensive driving on residential roads with inverse reinforcement learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our implementation, we learn this reward function from human data. We collect demonstrations of a driver in a simulation environment, and use Inverse Reinforcement Learning (Ng et al 2000;Abbeel and Ng 2005;Ziebart et al 2008;Levine and Koltun 2012;Shimosaka et al 2014;Kuderer et al 2015) to recover a reward function that explains the demonstrations.…”
Section: Offline Estimation Of Human Reward Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our implementation, we learn this reward function from human data. We collect demonstrations of a driver in a simulation environment, and use Inverse Reinforcement Learning (Ng et al 2000;Abbeel and Ng 2005;Ziebart et al 2008;Levine and Koltun 2012;Shimosaka et al 2014;Kuderer et al 2015) to recover a reward function that explains the demonstrations.…”
Section: Offline Estimation Of Human Reward Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our implementation, we learn this reward function from human data. We collect demonstrations of a driver in a simulation environment, and use Inverse Reinforcement Learning [1,12,15,19,23,29] to recover a reward function that explains the demonstrations.…”
Section: E Human Driver Rewardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, b N b , as defined in equation (11). e median of the MHD (MHD 50 ) had been used to evaluate the similarity of simulated and actual trajectories in modeling defensive driving strategies [44] and urban route planning [45].…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%