2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2545-2_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Security Threats for Smart Cities: A STRIDE-Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These early studies provided a foundation for deeper scholarly examinations of public trust in the context of smart cities. This line of inquiry has since been carried forward in numerous studies, as shown in Table 1 (Chatterjee et al, 2017; Khan et al, 2017; Braun et al, 2018; Anwar et al, 2020; Julsrud and Krogstad, 2020; Tyagi et al, 2020; Cole and Tran, 2022; Ip and Cheng, 2022; Spicer et al, 2023). Issues examined include security and privacy, ethical dimensions of surveillance, creation of public value through digitization of public services, and the ability of technology to facilitate productive state-society interactions in smart city governance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These early studies provided a foundation for deeper scholarly examinations of public trust in the context of smart cities. This line of inquiry has since been carried forward in numerous studies, as shown in Table 1 (Chatterjee et al, 2017; Khan et al, 2017; Braun et al, 2018; Anwar et al, 2020; Julsrud and Krogstad, 2020; Tyagi et al, 2020; Cole and Tran, 2022; Ip and Cheng, 2022; Spicer et al, 2023). Issues examined include security and privacy, ethical dimensions of surveillance, creation of public value through digitization of public services, and the ability of technology to facilitate productive state-society interactions in smart city governance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature also offers a variety of perspectives about the role of public trust in the context of smart cities, with security and privacy a common theme (Anwar, Nazir, and Ansari 2020; Tyagi et al 2020; Braun et al 2018; Chatterjee, Kumar Kar, and Gupta 2017; Khan, Pervez, and Abbasi 2017; Edwards 2016; van Zoonen 2016; Patsakis et al 2015; Khan, Pervez, and Abbasi 2014; Bohli, Langendorfer, and Skarmeta 2013). Topics of particular relevance to this study include the assertion of citizen control over politically or commercially captured smart city agendas (Keymolen 2019), the enhancement of trust in smart city endeavors through direct engagement and government-to-citizen communications about strategies, benefits, and risks (Glasco 2019), and smart city strategies as accountable for the variously described concept of “public value” (Bolivar 2019; Osella, Ferro, and Pautasso 2016; Cosgrave, Tryfonas, and Crick 2014; Walravens and Ballon 2013; Moore 1995).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem with the protection of personal information arises with the Internet of Things and intelligent technologies for crowdsourcing [16], such as in smart city projects [17]. Developers need to make sure that project initiators can collect and process big data for the purposes of data analytics and forecasting not only fast but also safely [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developers need to make sure that project initiators can collect and process big data for the purposes of data analytics and forecasting not only fast but also safely [18]. Yet, organizations may still face data privacy challenges and lose the people's trust in cases of information misuse [16]. It often happens with crowdsensing and crowdsourcing platforms [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%