2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling seepage erosion and bank retreat in a composite river bank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Pulmanki River, the bank sediment moisture rose after each rain event and bank collapses occurred after the rain had started and before the rising water level. Our results are also consistent with the observations of Karmaker and Dutta (), namely that the total annual river bank erosion in composite river banks can be caused by both groundwater seepage and fluvial erosion. Thus, the results agree with Karmaker and Dutta () and Fox et al () that erosion was controlled by the combination of groundwater seepage and fluvial erosion, in addition to mass failures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For the Pulmanki River, the bank sediment moisture rose after each rain event and bank collapses occurred after the rain had started and before the rising water level. Our results are also consistent with the observations of Karmaker and Dutta (), namely that the total annual river bank erosion in composite river banks can be caused by both groundwater seepage and fluvial erosion. Thus, the results agree with Karmaker and Dutta () and Fox et al () that erosion was controlled by the combination of groundwater seepage and fluvial erosion, in addition to mass failures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…22). The bank's soil of the river is highly erodible 23 and various reaches of the Brahmaputra river experience severe bank erosion during and after the monsoon every year due to seepage and fluvial erosion 24,25 .…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bank retreat usually includes two components: direct fluvial erosion by near‐bank flows and bank failure in response to geotechnical instability. The magnitude of fluvial erosion at the bank toe over a given period can be predicted by various empirical relationships, and the corresponding erosion rate is generally assumed to be equal to the product of the erodibility coefficient and the near‐bank excess shear stress (Julian & Torres, ; Karmaker & Dutta, , ). Mass failure can be predicted in terms of geotechnical slope stability or based on fluvial and gravitational forces that overcome the resisting forces of friction, interlocking, and cohesion (Amiri‐Tokaldany et al, ; Karmaker & Dutta, ; Midgley et al, ; Osman & Thorne, ; Partheniades, ; Simon, Curini, Darby, & Langendoen, ; Thorne & Tovey, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%