1992
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560440215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling solvent effects in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins

Abstract: A series of computer simulations has been carried out on bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor using various models to mimic the effects of explicit bulk solvent on the structure of the protein.The solvent properties included are the polarization of the solute by the polar bulk solvent and the restraining effect on the motional freedom of the solute due to frictional drag at the solventprotein surface interface. The former has been included by using a distance-dependent dielectric permittivity to screen the elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used two different forms of the dielectric constant: a constant dielectric constant of 15 and a distance-dependent dielectric constant described by Solmajer and Mehler 34,35 defined by…”
Section: The Potential Energy Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used two different forms of the dielectric constant: a constant dielectric constant of 15 and a distance-dependent dielectric constant described by Solmajer and Mehler 34,35 defined by…”
Section: The Potential Energy Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary effects would be practically eliminated by solvating the protein and constructing the NTP (or NTV) ensembles consistently for each of the simulations. It may be necessary to perform calculations on more fully solvated protein systems, at additional computational expense, or to explore the use of more computationally efficient models which take into account the effects of solvent on electrostatic interactions and protein dynamics [52,53]. There are also other possible sources of error, such as the force fields, and the assumed binding geometry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 In addition to overall rms deviations, we computed rms deviations with re- spect to the secondary structure elements given in Table 11. The solvent numbers are given for the first hydration shell in the initially solvated complexes as an indication of the overall solvent accessibility of each element.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoyever, including the first hydration shell (of 3-A thickness) ip the simulation, a value of k = 0.005 kcal/mol/A2 was found to give better results. 22 We have tested values of k = 25, 2.5, and 0.005 in the present work on the active-site MD of DHFR.…”
Section: Model For the Enzyme Actlve Site In Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%