2015
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1091886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling spatial trajectories in dynamics testing using basis splines: application to tracking human volunteers in low-speed frontal impacts

Abstract: Designing motor vehicle safety systems requires knowledge of whole body kinematics during dynamic loading for occupants of varying size and age, often obtained from sled tests with postmortem human subjects and human volunteers. Recently, we reported pediatric and adult responses in low-speed (<4 g) automotive-like impacts, noting reductions in maximum excursion with increasing age. Since the time-based trajectory shape is also relevant for restraint design, this study quantified the time-series trajectories u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several approaches that investigators have applied to extract features from a time series in order to use the data to model a given outcome. While some approaches, such as using frequency-domain analysis[ 9 , 21 ] or B-splines[ 22 , 23 ], have been successful in situations where a given timeframe is meaningful, in others, such as comparing physical activity trends across a population, they do not seem to have as much relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches that investigators have applied to extract features from a time series in order to use the data to model a given outcome. While some approaches, such as using frequency-domain analysis[ 9 , 21 ] or B-splines[ 22 , 23 ], have been successful in situations where a given timeframe is meaningful, in others, such as comparing physical activity trends across a population, they do not seem to have as much relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%