2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling species invasions in Ecopath with Ecosim: An evaluation using Laurentian Great Lakes models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EwE model is a popular choice given its moderate level of complexity, fast run time, and capacity to be linked to a generalized economic model of Lake Erie (J. Apriesnig and coworkers, Colorado State University, unpublished data). Details about Ecopath with Ecosim can be found in the user's manual as well as in many previous studies (e.g., Christensen and Walters 2004;Langseth et al 2012;Kao et al 2014). We also briefly describe the model in Supplement A.…”
Section: Ecopath With Ecosimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EwE model is a popular choice given its moderate level of complexity, fast run time, and capacity to be linked to a generalized economic model of Lake Erie (J. Apriesnig and coworkers, Colorado State University, unpublished data). Details about Ecopath with Ecosim can be found in the user's manual as well as in many previous studies (e.g., Christensen and Walters 2004;Langseth et al 2012;Kao et al 2014). We also briefly describe the model in Supplement A.…”
Section: Ecopath With Ecosimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when combined with other stressors (e.g., excess nutrient loading), the impacts of nonindigenous species can lead to complex, profound, and long-term changes (or regime shifts) to the recipient ecosystems (Madenjian et al 2013). To assess the potential ecosystem impacts of these synergistic and complex interactions, ecosystem models have increasingly been adopted to predict food web responses to the introduction of nonindigenous species (Pine et al 2007;Langseth et al 2012;Pinnegar et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miehls et al (2009a, b) introduction to a new ecosystem. Based on the quality of the data available to us, we followed their recommendation to use biomass forcing to assess hypothetical impacts of an invasive species introduction (Langseth et al 2012). This group also tried introducing the invasive species at a low biomass, but found they had to control the species' dynamics with an artificial fishery, which may also explain why we did not see major changes to the system when we introduced B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic models were developed under two scenarios: 1) Bellamya chinensis were introduced at a density of 0.0003 t km −2 and projected without biomass forcing or 2) Bellamya chinensis were introduced at a density of 0.0003 t km −2 and a biomass forcing function was loaded to simulate effects resulting from snail biomasses determined by logistic growth (de Vladar 2006) from the introduced density up to the carrying capacity. Carrying capacity was calculated for each reservoir (described inLangseth et al 2012), using a conservative value of 10% (3.838 t km −2 ) of the empirically calculated post-drought biomass of the B. chinensis population in Wild Plum of 38.58 t km −2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asian Carp (i.e., Grass, Silver and Bighead Carp) and their impacts or predicted impacts of have been a major focus of research on numerous systems throughout the Midwestern United States. However, most of this focus is centered on the Laurentian Great Lakes and the possibility of Asian Carp invasion in these systems (Langseth et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2016); relatively little research focus has been devoted to an equally important system, the Upper Mississippi River (Delong, 2010;Freedman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%