2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2017.7981137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling start-up modes and corresponding cycling costs in the unit commitment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [21], we extended a state-of-the-art DUC formulation [22] to include multiple start-up loading ramp rates of CCGT units and their associated maintenance costs. Leveraging an extended version of the model in [21], we analyzed the relation between the provision of spinning reserve capacity and CCGT start-up decisions for various shares of vRES and dynamic reserve requirements in [7]. Faster but more costly startups were found to reduce the total operating costs and the cost-optimal reserve requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [21], we extended a state-of-the-art DUC formulation [22] to include multiple start-up loading ramp rates of CCGT units and their associated maintenance costs. Leveraging an extended version of the model in [21], we analyzed the relation between the provision of spinning reserve capacity and CCGT start-up decisions for various shares of vRES and dynamic reserve requirements in [7]. Faster but more costly startups were found to reduce the total operating costs and the cost-optimal reserve requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faster but more costly startups were found to reduce the total operating costs and the cost-optimal reserve requirements. The work in [7,21], however, focused exclusively on the increased flexibility provided by increased start-up loading ramp rates, and did not consider the duration of the start-up procedure prior to loading, nor did it account for this duration as a minimum lead time when making or adjusting scheduling decisions based on updates of renewable energy forecasts. Furthermore, reserve requirements were imposed exogenously, whereas in what follows, we adopt probabilistic reserve constraints, which facilitate online, cost-optimal reserve sizing [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], the impact of varying the start-up rate and the corresponding turbine maintenance costs of CCGTs on their cycling regime was examined through a sensitivity analysis. In [12], a standard unit commitment formulation [13] was extended to allow multiple start-up loading modes while accounting for the appropriate turbine maintenance costs based on LTSAs. An exploratory case study in [12] investigated the need for start-up flexibility of CCGTs in the presence of a constant day-ahead overestimation of intermittent renewables and limited planning horizons by allowing a faster, but more costly, start-up mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], a standard unit commitment formulation [13] was extended to allow multiple start-up loading modes while accounting for the appropriate turbine maintenance costs based on LTSAs. An exploratory case study in [12] investigated the need for start-up flexibility of CCGTs in the presence of a constant day-ahead overestimation of intermittent renewables and limited planning horizons by allowing a faster, but more costly, start-up mode. Fast start-ups were found to be optimal on many occasions, leading to a more cost-efficient operating strategy when considering fast start maintenance penalties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation