2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Techniques in Planning of Terminals: The Quantitative Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their case, the equipment is controlled by an Equipment Control System (ECS), which is part of the standard IT setup of a CT. It is sometimes also subsumed in the term Terminal Operating System (TOS) [17]. Yang et al [18] describe a DT that monitors terminal operations enabling anomaly detection and operation analysis, all in real time.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their case, the equipment is controlled by an Equipment Control System (ECS), which is part of the standard IT setup of a CT. It is sometimes also subsumed in the term Terminal Operating System (TOS) [17]. Yang et al [18] describe a DT that monitors terminal operations enabling anomaly detection and operation analysis, all in real time.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petering et al (2009) [16] identified more than 40 simulation models, whose aim is to study container terminals. Issues concerning the design of automated marine container terminals using the methods of simulation can be found in many works, such as: Dulebenets et al (2015) [17], Saanen (2004) [14], Saanen (2011) [18], Duinkerken and Ottjes (2000) [19], Legato and Mazza (2001) [20], Liu et al (2002) [21], Liu and Dong (2008) [22], Vis and Harika (2004) [23], Nazari (2005) [24], Parola and Sciomachen (2005) [25], Zauner (2005) [26], Gunther and Kap-Hwan (2006) [27], Briskorn et al (2006) [28], Alessandri et al (2007) [29], Dai et al (2008) [30], Petering et al (2009) [16], Wiese et al (2009) [31], and Wiese et al (2010) [32]. Optimisation issues (exact optimisation approaches, heuristics and metaheuristics ones) must not be overlooked when considering various problems related to intermodal freight terminals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reach stacker to raise a large type A cargo container from a tractor-trailer (telescopic arms of the load handling deviceextending them, adjusting them to the length of the container and blocking the position of the arms -this part of the operation lasts on average 13 seconds, while the rest, i.e., changing the angle of inclination of the telescopic arm and changing the length of the telescopic arm -the extension -lasts from 1 to 3 s, depending on the analyzed height of the type A container: 1A, 1AAA, 1AAAA -the average for these containers is 3 a tractor-trailer with a velocity of 5 km/h and a distance of 25 m (the time can be modified according to the wellknown physical relation between time, travel route and speed -also applies to operations 3, 6, and 9). Stoppage of a vehicle after an audio klaxon signal of a reach stacker operator18 18.04/17.257/ 18.706/0.329…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current trends, the terminal planning process is mainly supported by advanced simulation-based modelling approaches as stated in Vis and de Koster (2003), Steenken et al (2004), Stahlbock and Voβ (2008) and mainly in Angeloudis and Bell (2011). Saanen (2011) stated that a model is a simplified representation of reality that enables a designer or planner to PhD Thesis investigate the subject in a cost-efficient way and allows for the consideration of the dynamics in the system.…”
Section: Storage Yard Planning and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%