2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0db9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the 2012 May 17 Solar Energetic Particle Event Using the AWSoM and iPATH Models

Abstract: We model the 2012 May 17 solar energetic particle event by combining the AWSoM and iPATH codes. Using this combined approach, we investigate particle acceleration when the parent coronal mass ejection (CME) is still close to the Sun. We have obtained reasonable agreements between our simulation and observations made by multiple spacecraft. We follow the three-dimensional CME and the CME-driven shock from their initiation using the AWSoM code for a period of 3 hours when the shock is below ∼20 R … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early applications of the 1D PATH code on individual SEP events have been pursued by Verkhoglyadova et al ( 37 , 38 ). Recently, the 2D iPATH code has been successfully used to reproduce the time profiles and event fluences for two large GLE events ( 39 , 40 ). These studies show the applicability of using the iPATH code and its capabilities to model extreme SEP and StEP events as pursued in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early applications of the 1D PATH code on individual SEP events have been pursued by Verkhoglyadova et al ( 37 , 38 ). Recently, the 2D iPATH code has been successfully used to reproduce the time profiles and event fluences for two large GLE events ( 39 , 40 ). These studies show the applicability of using the iPATH code and its capabilities to model extreme SEP and StEP events as pursued in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that some studies have examined the uncertainties of the solar wind solutions due to magnetic data from different observatories (Gressl et al, 2014;Hayashi et al, 2016;Jian et al, 2015;Riley et al, 2014). There are also recent studies that compare the solar wind solutions from the diachronic and synchronic magnetic inputs based on either Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) model (e.g., Caplan et al, 2021;Wallace et al, 2019) or MHD models (e.g., H. Li, et al, 2021;Linker et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher shock compression ratio and quasi-parallel nature found in the Case I also suggests the shock is a more efficient accelerator than in the Case II (Ding et al, 2020). However, due to the complex physical processes of the particle acceleration and transport involved, to quantitatively link the shock properties near the Sun to the SEP spectra at 1 AU requires advanced coupling between the MHD model and a particle acceleration/transport model (Young et al, 2021;G. Li et al, 2021), which is beyond the scope of this work and will be examined in a future study.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cme-driven Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%