2022
DOI: 10.1093/iti/liac017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the accident prediction for at-grade highway-rail crossings

Abstract: Since accidents at highway-rail at-grade crossings (HRGCs) are often catastrophic, safety prediction and evaluation at such locations are of great importance. In this paper, at-grade crossing inventory data and historical accident data were obtained from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA’s) Office of Safety online databases. The HRGC railroad and highway characteristics were selected as the influencing variables. Considering HRGC accidents are over-dispersed count data with excessive zeros, six count da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased traffic can result The estimated parameters from both base and comparison model gave intuitive results, as previously shown in the literature. For instance, variables such as average annual daily traffic, flashing light as a warning device, maximum timetable speed, and total daily trains were also indicated in previous studies to be factors associated with crash occurrence at HRGCs [3,7,11,16,[29][30][31][32]. In addition to the United States, several similar studies have been conducted in various other countries worldwide to understand the factors of HRGC crashes [32][33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased traffic can result The estimated parameters from both base and comparison model gave intuitive results, as previously shown in the literature. For instance, variables such as average annual daily traffic, flashing light as a warning device, maximum timetable speed, and total daily trains were also indicated in previous studies to be factors associated with crash occurrence at HRGCs [3,7,11,16,[29][30][31][32]. In addition to the United States, several similar studies have been conducted in various other countries worldwide to understand the factors of HRGC crashes [32][33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For instance, variables such as average annual daily traffic, flashing light as a warning device, maximum timetable speed, and total daily trains were also indicated in previous studies to be factors associated with crash occurrence at HRGCs [3,7,11,16,[29][30][31][32]. In addition to the United States, several similar studies have been conducted in various other countries worldwide to understand the factors of HRGC crashes [32][33][34][35]. It is believed that with the increase in average annual daily traffic and train traffic, exposure is increased as more vehicles and trains come into contact with the rail crossings, increasing the likelihood of crashes [2,3,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poisson model has been extensively used for safety analysis and prediction since the crash frequency (count) data are discrete, random, and non-negative integers (Hirst et al 2004). Negative binomial models derived from the Poisson model were developed to solve the overdispersion problem in count data (Yang et al 2022). Previous studies on HRGCs have predominantly focused on analyzing crash severity through the utilization of simulation, statistical and mathematical modeling techniques, as well as data mining and machine learning algorithms (Fan et Lu and Tolliver applied a Poisson regression model to evaluate the HRGC crash frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Yang et al (Yang et al 2022) applied the following six count data models for crash prediction: Poisson model, negative binomial model, zero-in ated Poisson model, zero-in ated negative binomial model, hurdle Poisson model, and hurdle negative binomial model. The zero-in ated negative binomial model performed better than the other ve models considering the statistical signi cance of factors, goodness-of-t, and zero in ations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%