2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the bids of wind power producers in the day-ahead market with stochastic market clearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Like [9], in our study, the problem of SCUC is assumed to have been solved exogenously in advance, and consequently, the UC constraints (i.e., ramping rates, startup costs/times, minimum down-times) are not considered. However, the proposed single period EM modeling approach containing single period robust MCM can be extended to a multi-period one.…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…• Like [9], in our study, the problem of SCUC is assumed to have been solved exogenously in advance, and consequently, the UC constraints (i.e., ramping rates, startup costs/times, minimum down-times) are not considered. However, the proposed single period EM modeling approach containing single period robust MCM can be extended to a multi-period one.…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these day-ahead bidding curves provided by WPPs, ISO, within a certain range of forecasted power outputs corresponding to each WPP, can dispatch the power outputs of WPPs in the day-ahead EM. However, a WPP should also be financially punished when its real time power output deviates from the day-ahead scheduled one [9]. In this work, we believed that different BMs adopted by WPPs may lead to different market results such as profits, clearing prices and operation cost of the power system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations