2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-017-0278-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Cycle-Dependent Material Hardening Behavior of 508 low Alloy Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the cyclic yield strength, the cyclic stress σ ′ 02 is 836.97 MPa. Under cyclic conditions, 0.2% of the residual plastic strain is usually too high of a value, therefore the cyclic stress for 0.01% of the residual plastic strain tends to provide a better adjustment [68]. This value is often named the cyclic proportional limit, σ ′ p , since the residual plastic strain level is very low.…”
Section: Monotonic and Cyclic Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the cyclic yield strength, the cyclic stress σ ′ 02 is 836.97 MPa. Under cyclic conditions, 0.2% of the residual plastic strain is usually too high of a value, therefore the cyclic stress for 0.01% of the residual plastic strain tends to provide a better adjustment [68]. This value is often named the cyclic proportional limit, σ ′ p , since the residual plastic strain level is very low.…”
Section: Monotonic and Cyclic Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, considering a value 0.2% of residual plastic strain, σ 02 results in 769.96 MPa. In spite of the reference 0.2% being applicable for engineering practice, the cyclic yield strength computed for a 0.01% residual plastic strain provided a better adjustment in the mechanical behavior response [53], and therefore σ 01 = 578.5 MPa was considered. Considering σ 01 = 578.5 MPa, resulted in an amount of softening, R y , of −463.5 MPa.…”
Section: Cyclic Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the axial Transactions of the ASME deformation of the specimen must be measured or controlled by either frame crosshead displacement (i.e., stroke) or frame actuator position. Previously [13][14][15], we conducted PWR environment tests by controlling the crosshead displacement. To predict the strain from the crosshead displacement data of the PWR tests, we used stroke-strain mapping functions generated from in-air tests data, where the in-air tests were controlled by the same crosshead displacement used for PWR tests.…”
Section: Pressurized Water Reactor Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%