2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the distribution of extreme returns in the Chinese stock market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works of Tolikas (2008) and Tolikas and Gettinby (2009) argue that overall the GL distribution proves a better fit when multiple sub periods are used. Hussain (2015) concludes that the GEV distribution is the best distribution to fit the extremes that exist in the right tail of indexes. Gilli and Kellezi (2006) on the other hand identified the GP distribution as the better choice for modelling extreme events in financial markets over the GEV distribution.…”
Section: Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The works of Tolikas (2008) and Tolikas and Gettinby (2009) argue that overall the GL distribution proves a better fit when multiple sub periods are used. Hussain (2015) concludes that the GEV distribution is the best distribution to fit the extremes that exist in the right tail of indexes. Gilli and Kellezi (2006) on the other hand identified the GP distribution as the better choice for modelling extreme events in financial markets over the GEV distribution.…”
Section: Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this paper, the focus is only on BMM because this approach is unrivaled in demonstrating extreme share price volatility for a given interval. Among researchers who also used this method in their analysis are [8], [9], [10]. In a study conducted by [11], it was found that whenever the returns were independent and identically distributed (i.i.d), an extreme limiting distribution had to be the Generalized Extreme Value Distribution (GEV).…”
Section: Extreme Value Theory and Extreme Risk Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is stimulated by increasing sign of uncertainty in the qualities of share returns and swollen recognition of the effects when adopting inaccurate stationarity assumption while analysing the series. Based on recent literature see (Tolikas, 2014;Hussain & Li, 2015;Marsani, Shabri & Jan, 2017) has not yet to be understood, and this study seeks to obtain validation. The study presented here is one of the first investigations to examine in detail the stationarity in extreme stock return by addressing how can one endorse extreme share returns is theoretically nonstationarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%