2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00452-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the diurnal variability of effective albedo for cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
46
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At U1, U2, and S1 the large field of view includes different surface materials, and the complex morphometric configuration (orientations, density, height) results in multiple reflections and shading, which all lower the reflectivity of the surface. The albedo measured in the city centre is significantly lower than values applied in numerical models, which are typically of the order of 15 to 20% for residential neighbourhoods (Sailor and Fan, 2002), suggesting that dense European city centres are better absorbers of K ↓ than most North American city surfaces. Comparably low values of ∼8% were recently reported from a dense urban canopy in Lodz, Poland (Offerle et al, 2003a) and from the city centre of Marseilles, France (Lemonsu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Albedomentioning
confidence: 78%
“…At U1, U2, and S1 the large field of view includes different surface materials, and the complex morphometric configuration (orientations, density, height) results in multiple reflections and shading, which all lower the reflectivity of the surface. The albedo measured in the city centre is significantly lower than values applied in numerical models, which are typically of the order of 15 to 20% for residential neighbourhoods (Sailor and Fan, 2002), suggesting that dense European city centres are better absorbers of K ↓ than most North American city surfaces. Comparably low values of ∼8% were recently reported from a dense urban canopy in Lodz, Poland (Offerle et al, 2003a) and from the city centre of Marseilles, France (Lemonsu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Albedomentioning
confidence: 78%
“…From Aida (1982Aida ( ). et al 2002Sailor and Fan 2002) or threedimensional arrays of homogeneous buildings Kanda et al 2005a;Kondo et al 2005) without snow cover and vegetation are theoretically predictable using the surface geometry, the albedo of the individual constituent facets, and the solar position. Measured values of albedo in urban areas range from 0.10 to 0.27, with a mean near 0.15 (see Oke 1987, 1988and Arnfield 2003.…”
Section: Urban Surfaces As the Bottommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One question is whether an appointed albedo value can replace the real varying albedo. According to the findings of Sailor and Fan, a typical albedo value may be better than a dynamic albedo [29]. Offerle et al [10] found that the diurnal variation albedo had little effect on net radiation and that it did not significantly improve the model accuracy (RMSE dropped by only 0.6 W/m 2 ).…”
Section: Narp Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%