2013
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effect of Direct and Indirect Contamination of On-Farm Bulk Tank Milk with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…paratuberculosis levels were estimated to be between 1.2 and 2.8 CFU/ml (8). While a 2013 study reported similar levels (0.54 to 7.03 CFU/ml) in most of the cases, they predicted that concentrations of up to 10 4 CFU/ml can occur, although rarely, in a worst-case scenario of fecal contamination of milk (7). In this study, we used qPCR to test 48 individual raw bulk tank milk samples obtained from farmers in central Switzerland and found all of them to be negative for M. avium subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…paratuberculosis levels were estimated to be between 1.2 and 2.8 CFU/ml (8). While a 2013 study reported similar levels (0.54 to 7.03 CFU/ml) in most of the cases, they predicted that concentrations of up to 10 4 CFU/ml can occur, although rarely, in a worst-case scenario of fecal contamination of milk (7). In this study, we used qPCR to test 48 individual raw bulk tank milk samples obtained from farmers in central Switzerland and found all of them to be negative for M. avium subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Through simulated modeling, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis levels in raw bulk tank milk (BTM) obtained from farms with good hygienic practices were estimated to fall between 0.54 and 7.03 CFU/ml (7). A recent quantitative risk assessment study of BTM supplied to three Italian dairy plants collected from 569 farms estimated M. avium subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be important if it is deemed that milk delivered for human consumption should be free of MAP, or if the MAP concentration should be below a certain threshold to ensure that pasteurization is effective [57]. However, the level of MAP in BTM may be greatly affected by indirect contamination via faeces from MAP excreting cows [58].…”
Section: Btm Culture and Btm Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various direct and indirect detection possibilities of MAP in feces and milk (Okura et al . ; Hatamifar et al . ; Husakova et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is no vaccination against MAP the only control of herd management is a close monitoring of the cattle and a culling of infected individuals as early as possible (Bastida and Juste 2011). There are various direct and indirect detection possibilities of MAP in feces and milk (Okura et al 2013;Hatamifar et al 2016;Husakova et al 2017). Either a direct detection of pathogens performed with faecal samples or organ material or an indirect method by antibody detection in serum or milk (Shreekumar and Jayarao 2002;Whittington 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%