2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01648.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effects of a Service Guarantee on Perceived Service Quality Using Alternating Conditional Expectations (ACE)*

Abstract: This paper addresses the dearth of empirical research on the relationship between service guarantee and perceived service quality (PSQ). In particular, we examine the moderating effects of a service guarantee on PSQ. While a recent study provided empirical evidence that service quality is affected by service guarantee and employee variables such as employee motivationlvision and learning through service failure, the nature and form of the relationships between these variables remain unclear. Knowledge of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, specification in terms of structural dimensions should allow researchers to strategically match alternative recovery systems to the conditions under which a firm operates and competes. In a broader sense, these results could be integrated and reconciled with studies presented in the quality management literature to investigate how recovery can be part of the overall total quality management system (Douglas & Fredendall, 2004), to explain how recovery systems might contribute to perceived quality (Babakus, Beinstock, & Van Scotter, 2004), and to further clarify the role and effectiveness of service guarantees in recovery (Sum, Lee, Hays, & Hill, 2002; Baker & Collier, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additionally, specification in terms of structural dimensions should allow researchers to strategically match alternative recovery systems to the conditions under which a firm operates and competes. In a broader sense, these results could be integrated and reconciled with studies presented in the quality management literature to investigate how recovery can be part of the overall total quality management system (Douglas & Fredendall, 2004), to explain how recovery systems might contribute to perceived quality (Babakus, Beinstock, & Van Scotter, 2004), and to further clarify the role and effectiveness of service guarantees in recovery (Sum, Lee, Hays, & Hill, 2002; Baker & Collier, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Research on services has primarily focused on the classification of services (Schmenner, 2004), service design (e.g., Easton & Pullman, 2001), and service quality (e.g., Carr, 2002;Sum, Lee, Hays, & Hill, 2002). In this context, much research has examined the effects of various service attributes (e.g., service quality, service failure, service recovery, recovery strategy) on customer outcomes (Babakus, Bienstock, & Van Scotter, 2004;Baker & Collier, 2005;Easton & Goodale, 2005;De Jong & De Ruyter, 2004;Krishnan, Ramaswamy, Meyer, & Damien, 1999;Ostrom & Iacobucci, 1995;Zhu, Sivakumar, & Parasuraman, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ACE algorithm derives transformations among variables to achieve the best fit, and these transformations are unambiguously defined and estimated without the use of heuristics, restrictive distributional assumptions, or restriction of the transformation to a particular parametric family. The ACE algorithm has been used by previous studies involving soil-water diffusivity (De Veaux and Steele, 1989), engine exhaust emissions (Rodriguez, 1985), material requirements planning (Sum, et al, 1995), the effects of service guarantee (Sum et al, 2002), and estimating optimal transformations for multiple regressions (Wang and Murphy, 2004). Details on the ACE algorithm can be found in (Breiman and Friedman, 1985;De Veaux, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%