2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5131865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the effects of slip on dipole–wall collision problems using a lattice Boltzmann equation method

Abstract: We study the physics of flow due to the interaction between a viscous dipole and boundaries that permit slip. This includes partial and free slip, and interactions near corners. The problem is investigated by using a two relaxation time lattice Boltzmann equation with moment-based boundary conditions. Navier-slip conditions, which involve gradients of the velocity, are formulated and applied locally. The implementation of free-slip conditions with the moment-based approach is discussed. Collision angles of 0°,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that most previous applications of moment-based boundary conditions [16,29,30,[38][39][40] impose a Navier-Stokes stress condition, Γ xx = 0 at a boundary but this has been shown to be inconsistent with the underlying moment system [28,33].…”
Section: A Moment-based Boundary Conditions For the Lattice Boltzmann Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that most previous applications of moment-based boundary conditions [16,29,30,[38][39][40] impose a Navier-Stokes stress condition, Γ xx = 0 at a boundary but this has been shown to be inconsistent with the underlying moment system [28,33].…”
Section: A Moment-based Boundary Conditions For the Lattice Boltzmann Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the flow velocity is given by equation (31). The computed solution with the Navier-Stokes stress condition Γ xx = 0 that has often been used with the moment-based approach [16,30,38,39,41] is also shown. The resolution is the same as above and the results are grid independent.…”
Section: Micro-couette Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, these two collision models automatically reduce to the two-relaxation-time TRT collision, 25,29 which is simpler, lattice independent, and more computationally efficient; additionally, the TRT allows for the solution parametrization, stability, and boundary/interface control with the help of the specific combination K of its two relaxation rates; moreover, the optimal TRT-ADE stability choice 31 K ¼ 1 4 remains robust in high Reynolds fluid flow modeling. 79 The methodology developed in the present work is especially compact with the TRT collision but it extends for any linear collision operator. Numerically, we solve steadystate linear ADE with the recent (stationary) S-TRT formulation 40 where (i) an arbitrary physical and model parameter range is available, because the S-TRT is quite insensitive to the transient stability restrictions and P eclet range, and (ii) the modeled solution is fixed by the grid P eclet number U=D 0 and K for any diffusion collision rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%