2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.2178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Floating Zone: Instabilities in the Half Zone and Full Zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,15,16 A comparison between the half-zone and full-zone has been carried out in Ref. 17 and shows that the dominant mechanism for the leading instability is qualitatively captured by the half-zone for Prandtl numbers less than 0.05. This justifies most of the studies on the half-zone configuration, at least to the first instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,15,16 A comparison between the half-zone and full-zone has been carried out in Ref. 17 and shows that the dominant mechanism for the leading instability is qualitatively captured by the half-zone for Prandtl numbers less than 0.05. This justifies most of the studies on the half-zone configuration, at least to the first instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first instability for Pr < 0.4 is characterized by stationary disturbances [Bouizi et al 2007]. Within this range, [Houchens and Walker 2005] further suggested three subregimes with different axial symmetries of the perturbations, which were confirmed in [Bouizi et al 2007], both in full-zone geometries. In [Levenstam and Amberg 1995;Leypoldt et al 2000] the secondary instability was found to be three-dimensional and oscillatory in the half-zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Note that Pr = 0.001 is chosen because its critical curve very likely marks the lower limit of critical curves for Pr → 0. According to [Houchens and Walker 2005], at Ha = 0 the Re FZ,cr for Pr = 10 −10 is less than 1% smaller than Re FZ,cr for Pr = 0.001. Details of the perturbation flow field and the energy analysis between the base state and perturbed field are presented and validated with other liquid bridge studies in [Huang and Houchens 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations