2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-005-0616-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Formation of Fluid Banks During Counter-Current Flow in Porous Media

Abstract: Fluid banks sometimes form during gravity-driven counter-current flow in certain natural reservoir processes. Prediction of flow performance in such systems depends on our understanding of the bank-formation process. Traditional modeling methods using a single capillary pressure curve based on a final saturation distribution have successfully simulated counter-current flow without fluid banks. However, it has been difficult to simulate counter-current flow with fluid banks. In this paper, we describe the succe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the qualitative agreement is encouraging, it is not conclusive because it is not clear to what extent the experimental conditions agree with the theoretical approximations. Recent attempts to model these observations based on the traditional theory require history matching, a complicated hysteresis model, and advance knowledge of multiple capillary pressure and relative permeability (boundary and scanning) curves (see Li et al, 2006; Schaerer et al, 2006). Contrary to this, our theory seems to be able to reproduce all experimentally observed profiles from a single parameter set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the qualitative agreement is encouraging, it is not conclusive because it is not clear to what extent the experimental conditions agree with the theoretical approximations. Recent attempts to model these observations based on the traditional theory require history matching, a complicated hysteresis model, and advance knowledge of multiple capillary pressure and relative permeability (boundary and scanning) curves (see Li et al, 2006; Schaerer et al, 2006). Contrary to this, our theory seems to be able to reproduce all experimentally observed profiles from a single parameter set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%