2020
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the impact of out‐of‐phase ventilation on normal lung tissue response to radiation dose

Abstract: Purpose: To create a dose-response model that predicts lung ventilation change following radiation therapy, and examine the effects of out-of-phase ventilation. Methods: The dose-response model was built using 27 human subjects who underwent radiation therapy (RT) from an IRB-approved trial. For each four-dimensional computed tomography, two ventilation maps were created by calculating the N-phase local expansion ratio (LER N ) using most or all breathing phases and the 2-phase LER (LER 2 ) using only the end … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al and Wallet et al and was chosen for consistency. Additionally, it is the threshold used for evaluation of damage in the clinical trial the human patients were taken from 6 , 39 . Dose binned analysis was performed using the same contours created for the HU analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al and Wallet et al and was chosen for consistency. Additionally, it is the threshold used for evaluation of damage in the clinical trial the human patients were taken from 6 , 39 . Dose binned analysis was performed using the same contours created for the HU analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, detailed dose response models are required. In recent years, multiple groups have begun developing these models and some have tested their efficacy in clinical trials ( McDonald et al, 1995 ) ( Mah and Dyk, 1988 ) ( Mehta, 2005 ) ( Graves et al, 2010 ) ( Patton et al, 2018 ) ( Koike et al, 2015 ) ( Hopkins et al, 2012 ) ( Zhang et al, 2010 ) ( Vinogradskiy et al, 2013 ) ( Wallat et al, 2020 ) ( Wallat et al, 2021 ) ( Bates et al, 2009 ) ( Hoover et al, 2014 ) ( Ireland et al, 2016 ) ( Vicente et al, 2020 ). To date, the only prospective clinical trials using these techniques have been ventilation-based ( Bayouth et al, 2019 ) and all non-contrast CT-derived methods have been exclusively ventilation based ( Patton et al, 2018 ) ( Vinogradskiy et al, 2013 ) ( Vicente et al, 2020 ) ( Castillo et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By excluding the full inhale volume of the second scan, the new TV (80IN-0EX) may more closely match the TV of the first scan and be used for ensuing calculation of CT-ventilation biomarkers. Selecting inhale volumes to achieve ETV between scans accommodates for differences in breathing effort that affect lung volumes; this method of effort correction has previously been described in depth ( Wallat et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%