Modeling the Impacts of Urban Flood Risk Management on Social Inequality

Abstract

The exposure of urban populations to flooding is highly heterogeneous, with the negative impacts of flooding experienced disproportionately by the poor. In developing countries experiencing rapid urbanization and population growth a key distinction in the urban landscape is between planned development and unplanned, informal development, which often occurs on marginal, flood‐prone land. Flood risk management in the context of informality is challenging, and may exacerbate existing social inequalities and entrench poverty. Here, we adapt an existing socio‐hydrological model of human‐flood interactions to account for a stratified urban society consisting of planned and informal settlements. In the first instance, we use the model to construct four system archetypes based on idealized scenarios of risk reduction and disaster recovery. We then perform a sensitivity analysis to examine the relative importance of the differential values of vulnerability, risk‐aversion, and flood awareness in determining the relationship between flood risk management and social inequality. The model results suggest that reducing the vulnerability of informal communities to flooding plays an important role in reducing social inequality and enabling sustainable economic growth, even when the exposure to the flood hazard remains high. Conversely, our model shows that increasing risk aversion may accelerate the decline of informal communities by suppressing economic growth. On this basis, we argue for urban flood risk management which is rooted in pro‐poor urban governance and planning agendas which recognize the legitimacy and permanence of informal communities in cities.

Willingness to Pay for the Maintenance of Green Infrastructure in Six Chinese Pilot Sponge Cities

“…Continuous urbanization and global climate change have created great challenges for the piped-drainage systems, causing cities around the world to suffer from waterlogging or problems related to pluvial flooding [1][2][3]. The concept of green infrastructure (GI) stands for interconnected networks of all kinds of green spaces [4], including raingardens, bioswales, detention or retention ponds, etc.…”

A data-driven spatial approach to characterize the flood hazard

“…The perilous and expensive nature of flood hazards calls for concurrent improvements in the ability of scientists to measure their risk (Kron, 2005 ). Moreover, rapid increases in the population living in marginal areas relative to the flood hazards (Moulds et al, 2021 ), amid the consequences of land use changes such as in Bangladesh (Dewan et al, 2007 ), Belgium (Akter et al, 2018 ), India (Guhathakurta et al, 2011 ), China (Shen et al, 2021 ), the United States (Qiang et al, 2017 ), and elsewhere, a changing climate (Zhou et al, 2012 ; Kreibich et al, 2015 ), sea level rise (Nicholls et al, 1999 ; Bushra et al, 2021 ), and local factors such as subsidence (Mostafiz et al, 2021a ) and extreme weather events (Guhathakurta et al, 2011 ), underline the urgent need for accelerated improvements in flood risk assessment (Merz et al, 2014 ; Mostafiz, 2022 ). Yet proportionately little advancement has been made.…”

Modeling and Mapping Flood Hazard with a Flood Risk Assessment Tool: A Case Study of Austin, Texas

“…Marginalized populations disproportionably inhabited the hazard-prone areas; they are more susceptible to the impact and have extremely low coping mechan-Journal of Geographic Information System isms with socio-natural disasters [9]. The adverse impacts of flooding [are] experienced disproportionately by the poor [10]. Their research simulates the interactions of flood events with flood response models to examine flood impact in socially heterogeneous communities.…”