2017
DOI: 10.1037/mil0000165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Indirect Association of Combat Exposure With Anger and Aggression During Combat Deployment: The Moderating Role of Perceived Unit Morale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, most studies of soldiers’ combat stressors gather retrospective measures after soldiers return home (e.g., Currie et al, 2011; Mitchell et al, 2011) or opt for a pre- and post-deployment strategy (e.g., Contractor et al, 2017; Franz et al, 2013). A few studies, however, obtained data at one time during deployment (e.g., Dyches et al, 2017; Schaubroeck et al, 2011; Taylor et al, 2014), sometimes including a follow-up after they returned home (Vinokur et al, 2011). Each study tended to have one or more serious problems, however, including the effects of recall bias (e.g., memory loss/reconstruction due to over-reliance on long-term memory after deployment is over), the uncontrolled possibility of reverse-causation, and the loose definition of combat situations (e.g., being deployed to a wide combat region but being a member of an air force ground crew that never saw actual combat).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, most studies of soldiers’ combat stressors gather retrospective measures after soldiers return home (e.g., Currie et al, 2011; Mitchell et al, 2011) or opt for a pre- and post-deployment strategy (e.g., Contractor et al, 2017; Franz et al, 2013). A few studies, however, obtained data at one time during deployment (e.g., Dyches et al, 2017; Schaubroeck et al, 2011; Taylor et al, 2014), sometimes including a follow-up after they returned home (Vinokur et al, 2011). Each study tended to have one or more serious problems, however, including the effects of recall bias (e.g., memory loss/reconstruction due to over-reliance on long-term memory after deployment is over), the uncontrolled possibility of reverse-causation, and the loose definition of combat situations (e.g., being deployed to a wide combat region but being a member of an air force ground crew that never saw actual combat).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary further analyses of anger data in this combat-deployed cohort show that the trajectory of anger symptoms mirrors the trajectories of PTSD symptoms and is likely predicted by the same factors that drive posttraumatic stress symptom recruitment over time, namely, lifetime trauma history and combat exposures on deployment. A number of studies have found that this association between combat exposure and anger (Adler et al, 2011;Cabrera et al, 2016;Chemtob et al, 1997;Dyches et al, 2017;Gilam et al, 2017;Hoge et al, 2004;Killgore et al, 2008;MacManus et al, 2015;Rona et al, 2015) and lifetime trauma, particularly occurring in childhood, has been reliably associated with impairment to emotional regulation and threat detection systems (Marusak et al, 2015), both implicated in problematic anger and aggression. Importantly, it appears that the same or similar mechanisms may underpin these relationships, providing some explanation for the link between anger and PTSD.…”
Section: Mechanisms Underlying the Development Of Anger In Deployed P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, military morale has been shown to mitigate the effect of job-related stress on performance (Milgram et al 1989;). Furthermore, morale has been found to be negatively associated with the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (Whitesell and Owens 2012;Dyches et al 2017). Therefore, it is important to explore how the personal factors of each individual member of an organization affect the overall level of organizational morale.…”
Section: Defining Military Moralementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several previous studies have used a similar single-item approach (e.g. Whitesell and Owens 2012;Gal 1986;Gal and Manning 1987;Dyches et al 2017), we decided to use those variables separately as a construct of individual and collective types of morale and, additionally, aggregate all items together as one cumulative variable of direct military morale. The questionnaire used a five-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree (1)" to "strongly agree (5)".…”
Section: Measures Of Military Morale Personality and Socio-democratic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation