2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2010.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the input non-quasi-static effect in small signal equivalent circuit based on charge partitioning for bipolar transistors and its impact on RF noise modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one is free to choose a very accurate NQS model and highly approximated expressions for y-parameters while implementing the noise model, it is logical to have consistency in both. Our four-node model of (13) preserves this consistency since the y-parameters of (3) and (4) are used in (1) to obtain (7), implementation of which takes the form of (13). On the other hand, our single-node model of (15) uses highly approximated expressions of y-parameters that read which yields (8) [6] from (1) assuming A Q3 = 1 along with λ = 1.…”
Section: B Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although one is free to choose a very accurate NQS model and highly approximated expressions for y-parameters while implementing the noise model, it is logical to have consistency in both. Our four-node model of (13) preserves this consistency since the y-parameters of (3) and (4) are used in (1) to obtain (7), implementation of which takes the form of (13). On the other hand, our single-node model of (15) uses highly approximated expressions of y-parameters that read which yields (8) [6] from (1) assuming A Q3 = 1 along with λ = 1.…”
Section: B Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it and ibei are the quasi-static transfer current and internal base current, respectively. Tf, kc, and alqf (3,4,5) correspond to τ f , k c , and A Q (3,4,5) , respectively. (14) can further be simplified by taking: 1) A Q = 0 in all the denominator terms; 2) A Q5 = 0; and 3) A Q4 = 0, which convert (14) into…”
Section: B Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since in forward active operation, effects of y 12 and y 22 are negligible in (2), we did not consider them in formulating our model. First of all, this assumption leads to [11], we observe that small-signal forward diffusion charge ΔQ f affects y 11 as well as y 21 ; hence, effectively determines input as well as the cross-correlated PSD terms of (2). Introducing a delay into the small-signal QS forward diffusion charge ΔQ f0 (=g m0 τ f Δv B ), we obtain (with τ f as transit time and A Q as model parameter)…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delayed minority charge (3) suffices to model the y 11 and y 21 , except the phase of the latter [1]. If a further extra phase to be incorporated in (y 21 (ω)-g m0 ) equals exp(-jωτ D0 ) (with τ D0 as model parameter), …”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%