1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00077-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the kinetics and microstructural evolution during static recrystallization—Monte Carlo simulation of recrystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping is carried out by using a procedure described elsewhere [6]. The .where 8 is the misorientation between two subgrains, T~ is energy per unit area of a high-angle boundary, and 6* is the misorientation limit for low angle boundaries, which is usually taken as 15".…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mapping is carried out by using a procedure described elsewhere [6]. The .where 8 is the misorientation between two subgrains, T~ is energy per unit area of a high-angle boundary, and 6* is the misorientation limit for low angle boundaries, which is usually taken as 15".…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the MC simulation of recrystallization was coupled to a finite element (FE) simulation of microstructural deformation based on crystal plasticity [5,6]. The crystal plasticity model provided a quantitative description of the stored energy and orientation distributions in the deformed microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesoscopic computer simulation provides an alternative approach to experimentation. Over the last decades, many computational simulations of recrystallization have been reported, such as Monte Carlo (MC) model [3], cellular automaton (CA) models [5][6] and phase field models [7][8]. In these computational approaches, The Monte Carlo method and cellular automaton (CA)'s unrealistic assumption lead to the results of the simulation deviates from the experimental observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ideal JMAK behavior is rarely exhibited by real materials. Such deviation from this ideal behavior is due to the presence of recovery, non-uniform distribution of stored strain energy, non-random distribution of recrystallized nuclei, and anisotropic growth of the recrystallized nuclei [22]. For this category of models, experimental validation is often lacking, and good agreement between numerical and experimental data in terms of grain size is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%